Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
- 162 -<br />
Appendix C: Responses to Substantive Comments<br />
population of a given species. State fish <strong>and</strong> wildlife agencies have an excellent record of<br />
sound, professional wildlife management, <strong>and</strong> this is true in Massachusetts as well.<br />
<strong>Fish</strong>ing<br />
Most fishing comments are directed toward the proposal to allow fishing at Puffer Pond<br />
on the <strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>NWR</strong>. There is considerable support for fishing on Puffer Pond.<br />
There are also a number of respondents who request that fishing be prohibited on Puffer<br />
Pond. These individuals argue that anglers will disturb nesting birds, erode the shoreline,<br />
trample vegetation, contribute to the spread of invasives, <strong>and</strong> drag boats through the<br />
refuge.<br />
<strong>Fish</strong>ing is one of the priority wildlife dependent uses for national wildlife refuges, where<br />
compatible. As such, the staff has determined that fishing is compatible with refuge<br />
purposes. Staff from <strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>NWR</strong> will finalize the details of fishing on Puffer Pond<br />
as a part of the <strong>Fish</strong>ing Management Plan. Staff will ensure that impacts to the resources<br />
in <strong>and</strong> surrounding the pond are minimized. This is evidenced by the stipulations already<br />
included in the draft plan. No motorized boats will be allowed, greatly reducing the<br />
likelihood of invasive species being brought to the pond. Public use in general causes some<br />
disturbance of vegetation <strong>and</strong> wildlife. We will manage all public uses, including fishing, to<br />
minimize the disturbance <strong>and</strong> ensure that the level of disturbance does not materially<br />
interfere with the purposes of the refuges. We share the concern about the potential<br />
introduction of invasive species, as well as other types of disturbance. We will continue to<br />
monitor disturbance caused by public uses of the refuges <strong>and</strong> take any action that we deem<br />
necessary or appropriate.<br />
Environmental Education<br />
A majority of commentors who chose to address environmental education support the<br />
efforts <strong>and</strong> facilities proposed in Alternative B, advocating more environmental<br />
education for people of all ages. Several respondents encourage completion of the<br />
proposed Sudbury <strong>River</strong> interpretive canoe trail. Some of the commentors encourage the<br />
FWS to think bigger, <strong>and</strong> develop its educational plan in concert with other regional<br />
entities <strong>and</strong> efforts.<br />
Environmental education is one of the priority wildlife dependent uses for national wildlife<br />
refuges. As such, the staff has determined that it is compatible with refuge purposes <strong>and</strong><br />
will continue to work to provide these opportunities. The staff is encouraged by the<br />
support that individuals <strong>and</strong> groups have shown for environmental education. We look<br />
forward to continuing <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ing educational opportunities associated with the<br />
refuges.<br />
<strong>Wildlife</strong> Observation Trails<br />
Some of the organizations <strong>and</strong> towns that commented on the <strong>CCP</strong> included requests for<br />
trails to be developed in specific areas that would connect to adjacent trail systems. In<br />
some cases, the requests are for formalizing trails that have been created by individuals<br />
<strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>NWR</strong>