23.12.2012 Views

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 24 -<br />

Chapter 3: Refuge <strong>and</strong> Resource Descriptions<br />

of the AEHA findings, Fort Devens issued a catch-<strong>and</strong>-release advisory for<br />

Puffer Pond.<br />

OHM Corporation - 1992<br />

OHM Corporation (OHM) prepared a work plan (August 1992) for a Puffer<br />

Pond fish study to be conducted under contract to USATHAMA. The work<br />

plan incorporated a discussion of the methods <strong>and</strong> results of an ecological<br />

survey of Puffer Pond fish conducted by OHM in the spring of 1992. Using<br />

hook <strong>and</strong> line, on April 24 OHM caught <strong>and</strong> released 23 largemouth bass,<br />

<strong>and</strong> on May 1 OHM caught <strong>and</strong> released three pickerel, three largemouth<br />

bass, two black crappie, <strong>and</strong> two yellow perch. OHM visually inspected the<br />

fish, looked for swimming eccentricities, <strong>and</strong> observed nesting patterns<br />

along the shoreline. They found no deformities, behavioral problems, or<br />

other indications of stress or disease. OHM concluded that Puffer Pond<br />

contained a diverse <strong>and</strong> balanced fish population with no overt signs of<br />

stress.<br />

OHM’s work plan exp<strong>and</strong>ed the goals of the Puffer Pond fish studies to<br />

address ecological risks as well as human health risks. The plan was to<br />

make comparisons to background ponds, using fish data from the <strong>Service</strong>,<br />

the MADEP, <strong>and</strong> the published literature. OHM presented criteria for<br />

selecting background data from the identified sources.<br />

The field program was conducted in October 1992. OHM collected fish<br />

using a shrimp trawl instead of seines, because of flood conditions <strong>and</strong><br />

because of cold water <strong>and</strong> air temperatures. The flood conditions prevented<br />

OHM from collecting largemouth bass or any other top predator species.<br />

Black crappies were collected, <strong>and</strong> they were used to represent the<br />

predator trophic level. <strong>Fish</strong> background data provided to OHM were<br />

rejected as insufficient or inappropriate, on the basis of the selection<br />

criteria established in the work plan. OHM concluded from its quantitative<br />

human health <strong>and</strong> ecological risk assessments that the observed conditions<br />

do not pose a risk to human receptors (OHM April 1994, p. 5-9) <strong>and</strong> that the<br />

concentrations of analytes observed in the fish tissue “do not appear to be<br />

affecting the ecological health of Puffer Pond” (OHM 1992, p. 6-5).<br />

Ecology <strong>and</strong> Environment - 1993<br />

E&E conducted a bioaccumulation study at Puffer Pond to evaluate the<br />

extent of fish contamination <strong>and</strong> to fill data gaps in previous investigations.<br />

Sampling of surface water, sediment, <strong>and</strong> fish was conducted in Puffer<br />

Pond <strong>and</strong> in a background pond in November, 1993. Ministers Pond,<br />

located northeast of the junction of Routes 117 <strong>and</strong> 62 near the center of<br />

Stow, was selected as the background pond to use for comparing Puffer<br />

Pond sampling results. It generally met the following criteria:<br />

no or minimal potential site-related impacts;<br />

<strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>NWR</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!