Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 24 -<br />
Chapter 3: Refuge <strong>and</strong> Resource Descriptions<br />
of the AEHA findings, Fort Devens issued a catch-<strong>and</strong>-release advisory for<br />
Puffer Pond.<br />
OHM Corporation - 1992<br />
OHM Corporation (OHM) prepared a work plan (August 1992) for a Puffer<br />
Pond fish study to be conducted under contract to USATHAMA. The work<br />
plan incorporated a discussion of the methods <strong>and</strong> results of an ecological<br />
survey of Puffer Pond fish conducted by OHM in the spring of 1992. Using<br />
hook <strong>and</strong> line, on April 24 OHM caught <strong>and</strong> released 23 largemouth bass,<br />
<strong>and</strong> on May 1 OHM caught <strong>and</strong> released three pickerel, three largemouth<br />
bass, two black crappie, <strong>and</strong> two yellow perch. OHM visually inspected the<br />
fish, looked for swimming eccentricities, <strong>and</strong> observed nesting patterns<br />
along the shoreline. They found no deformities, behavioral problems, or<br />
other indications of stress or disease. OHM concluded that Puffer Pond<br />
contained a diverse <strong>and</strong> balanced fish population with no overt signs of<br />
stress.<br />
OHM’s work plan exp<strong>and</strong>ed the goals of the Puffer Pond fish studies to<br />
address ecological risks as well as human health risks. The plan was to<br />
make comparisons to background ponds, using fish data from the <strong>Service</strong>,<br />
the MADEP, <strong>and</strong> the published literature. OHM presented criteria for<br />
selecting background data from the identified sources.<br />
The field program was conducted in October 1992. OHM collected fish<br />
using a shrimp trawl instead of seines, because of flood conditions <strong>and</strong><br />
because of cold water <strong>and</strong> air temperatures. The flood conditions prevented<br />
OHM from collecting largemouth bass or any other top predator species.<br />
Black crappies were collected, <strong>and</strong> they were used to represent the<br />
predator trophic level. <strong>Fish</strong> background data provided to OHM were<br />
rejected as insufficient or inappropriate, on the basis of the selection<br />
criteria established in the work plan. OHM concluded from its quantitative<br />
human health <strong>and</strong> ecological risk assessments that the observed conditions<br />
do not pose a risk to human receptors (OHM April 1994, p. 5-9) <strong>and</strong> that the<br />
concentrations of analytes observed in the fish tissue “do not appear to be<br />
affecting the ecological health of Puffer Pond” (OHM 1992, p. 6-5).<br />
Ecology <strong>and</strong> Environment - 1993<br />
E&E conducted a bioaccumulation study at Puffer Pond to evaluate the<br />
extent of fish contamination <strong>and</strong> to fill data gaps in previous investigations.<br />
Sampling of surface water, sediment, <strong>and</strong> fish was conducted in Puffer<br />
Pond <strong>and</strong> in a background pond in November, 1993. Ministers Pond,<br />
located northeast of the junction of Routes 117 <strong>and</strong> 62 near the center of<br />
Stow, was selected as the background pond to use for comparing Puffer<br />
Pond sampling results. It generally met the following criteria:<br />
no or minimal potential site-related impacts;<br />
<strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>NWR</strong>