23.12.2012 Views

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 168 -<br />

Appendix C: Responses to Substantive Comments<br />

NHESP suggested working cooperatively with the <strong>Service</strong> for review of impacts to statelisted<br />

species when construction or demolition projects are proposed.<br />

The <strong>Service</strong> will continue to include NHESP in review of appropriate projects.<br />

Staffing<br />

Most commentors feel that adequate refuge staffing is essential. While many people<br />

assert that Alternative B will meet desired staffing levels, a number of other respondents<br />

contend that proposed staffing levels are too low. These people cite anticipated user<br />

conflicts, present refuge hazards, <strong>and</strong> the current downsizing trend in government as<br />

reasons to increase proposed staffing levels. Some respondents suggest utilizing<br />

community groups <strong>and</strong>/or to form partnerships with volunteer organizations to<br />

supplement staffing needs.<br />

We appreciate the support for increased staffing levels. We have proposed the level of<br />

staffing that we feel is appropriate to implement the programs outlined in the <strong>CCP</strong>.<br />

Wild <strong>and</strong> Scenic <strong>River</strong>s<br />

The one concern regarding wild <strong>and</strong> scenic river designation expressed by several<br />

respondents is that hunting is incompatible with this designation <strong>and</strong> should be<br />

prohibited within these areas.<br />

The Wild & Scenic <strong>River</strong>s Act (WSR) does not prohibit hunting, nor does it indicate that<br />

hunting is incompatible with the intent of the WSR designation.<br />

Enforcement<br />

Respondents who comment on enforcement indicate that the level of enforcement on the<br />

refuge needs to increase. The key areas identified by respondents as needing increased<br />

policing efforts are off-highway vehicle trespass, poaching, dumping, trespass, <strong>and</strong><br />

v<strong>and</strong>alism.<br />

We are aware of a number of violations that occur on refuge l<strong>and</strong>s. Our law enforcement<br />

staff is working to correct these violations <strong>and</strong> are bringing in outside help when<br />

necessary. The number of violation notices issued during the past year is a testament to<br />

our focused law enforcement efforts. We look forward to implementation of the <strong>CCP</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

the opportunity to exp<strong>and</strong> our law enforcement presence through the potential addition of<br />

staff, agreements with local law enforcement agencies, <strong>and</strong> continued cooperation with<br />

State environmental police officers.<br />

Invasives<br />

Many respondents support efforts to eliminate invasive non-native species. Several<br />

respondents raise concerns about invasives at Puffer Pond, given new fishing access.<br />

Concerns about targeted species are raised in two cases: one respondent argues that<br />

<strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>NWR</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!