Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 168 -<br />
Appendix C: Responses to Substantive Comments<br />
NHESP suggested working cooperatively with the <strong>Service</strong> for review of impacts to statelisted<br />
species when construction or demolition projects are proposed.<br />
The <strong>Service</strong> will continue to include NHESP in review of appropriate projects.<br />
Staffing<br />
Most commentors feel that adequate refuge staffing is essential. While many people<br />
assert that Alternative B will meet desired staffing levels, a number of other respondents<br />
contend that proposed staffing levels are too low. These people cite anticipated user<br />
conflicts, present refuge hazards, <strong>and</strong> the current downsizing trend in government as<br />
reasons to increase proposed staffing levels. Some respondents suggest utilizing<br />
community groups <strong>and</strong>/or to form partnerships with volunteer organizations to<br />
supplement staffing needs.<br />
We appreciate the support for increased staffing levels. We have proposed the level of<br />
staffing that we feel is appropriate to implement the programs outlined in the <strong>CCP</strong>.<br />
Wild <strong>and</strong> Scenic <strong>River</strong>s<br />
The one concern regarding wild <strong>and</strong> scenic river designation expressed by several<br />
respondents is that hunting is incompatible with this designation <strong>and</strong> should be<br />
prohibited within these areas.<br />
The Wild & Scenic <strong>River</strong>s Act (WSR) does not prohibit hunting, nor does it indicate that<br />
hunting is incompatible with the intent of the WSR designation.<br />
Enforcement<br />
Respondents who comment on enforcement indicate that the level of enforcement on the<br />
refuge needs to increase. The key areas identified by respondents as needing increased<br />
policing efforts are off-highway vehicle trespass, poaching, dumping, trespass, <strong>and</strong><br />
v<strong>and</strong>alism.<br />
We are aware of a number of violations that occur on refuge l<strong>and</strong>s. Our law enforcement<br />
staff is working to correct these violations <strong>and</strong> are bringing in outside help when<br />
necessary. The number of violation notices issued during the past year is a testament to<br />
our focused law enforcement efforts. We look forward to implementation of the <strong>CCP</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
the opportunity to exp<strong>and</strong> our law enforcement presence through the potential addition of<br />
staff, agreements with local law enforcement agencies, <strong>and</strong> continued cooperation with<br />
State environmental police officers.<br />
Invasives<br />
Many respondents support efforts to eliminate invasive non-native species. Several<br />
respondents raise concerns about invasives at Puffer Pond, given new fishing access.<br />
Concerns about targeted species are raised in two cases: one respondent argues that<br />
<strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>NWR</strong>