Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Eastern Massachusetts National Wildlife Refuge Complex Draft CCP/EA November 26, 2003 Some respondents point out the economic benefits of horseback riding, stating that equine activities are engaged in by a large number of Massachusetts citizens and also make a significant contribution to the Massachusetts economy. For example, they assert that equine agriculture provides over $200 million per year in direct spending into the Massachusetts economy, over 5,000 jobs and more than $13.2 million in state and local tax revenues. Limiting horseback riding would harm the economy. Equestrians state that they oppose expansion of the refuge’s boundaries as long as it limits horseback riding. Dog-Walking Many respondents assert that given the popularity and demand for areas to walk dogs, and the fact that parts of the refuge have been used responsibly for decades by dog-walkers; FWS should make part of the refuge available for this pastime. These dog walking enthusiasts request that leashed dog-walking be allowed on refuge trails in appropriate areas, and that strict fines are in place for anyone releasing a dog or failing to pick up after their animal. Others are willing to allow an exclusion of dogs during the most sensitive times, when wildlife surveys identify an impact on nesting birds or other animal life. Many of these respondents view dog-walking as meditative and a way of connecting to the natural beauty of the earth, something that is consistent with refuge goals. These respondents assert that without substantial evidence that dog-walkers are threatening the integrity of the refuge it is unjust and an act of discrimination to prohibit dog-walking. On the other hand, one respondent would like to see dogs banned from the refuge, stating that many dog owners don’t obey leash rules to the detriment of wildlife, and further, even on a leash dogs frighten animals. Birdwatching Birdwatchers and nature photographers are concerned that they will be confined strictly to trails when observing wildlife, while hunters would not. If hunters are allowed off trail, they assert, birders should be allowed off trail as well. Trapping Some respondents ask that the Refuge be open to beaver and muskrat trapping, asserting that modern traps are instant and humane, and arguing that small game threatens children, pets, and livestock, and that beavers “cause extensive property damage.” Some respondents ask whether and under what circumstances which furbearers could be trapped, and what constitutes an invasive species and appropriate control methods. Some respondents oppose trapping on the grounds that it is inhumane; other respondents perceive trapping as ham-fisted interference in natural systems that function best on their own. Summary of Comments 25
Eastern Massachusetts National Wildlife Refuge Complex Draft CCP/EA November 26, 2003 Socioeconomic Concerns Several respondents applaud Alternative B for helping to make Maynard a “destination.” One respondent requests permission to graze in the Oxbow unit, and one requests continued cooperative farming. Several area residents request development of an “abutter policy,” without clearly articulating what the components of such a policy would be. Several respondents urge consideration of impacts to area parking, specifically at Monsen Road at Great Meadows, and at the east gate of Assabet River off Old Marlborough Road. Some respondents are concerned about refuse at entry points. Summary of Comments 26
Page 1 and 2:
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Assabe
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introd
Page 9:
Table D-2: Birds of Assabet River N
Page 12 and 13:
- 2 - Chapter 1: Introduction and B
Page 14 and 15:
“To administer a national network
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
- 10 - Chapter 1: Introduction and
Page 22 and 23:
Blue Iris: Photo by Marijke Holtrop
Page 24 and 25:
- 14 - Trailmarker: Photo by Karla
Page 26 and 27:
- 16 - Chapter 2: The Comprehensive
Page 28 and 29:
- 18 - Forested Wetland: Photo By E
Page 30 and 31:
- 20 - Chapter 3: Refuge and Resour
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Canada Geese: Photo by Paul Buckley
Page 44 and 45:
- 34 - Beaver activity at Assabet R
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
- 40 - Wild Mushroom: Photo by Mari
Page 52 and 53:
Chapter 3: Refuge and Resource Desc
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Mallard with ducklings: Photo by Jo
Page 58 and 59:
Chapter 4: Management Direction Str
Page 60 and 61:
- 50 - One of the buildings that ha
Page 62 and 63:
Trail: Photo by Stanley Klein - 52
Page 64 and 65:
- 54 - Chapter 4: Management Direct
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
- 58 - Wood Frog Eggs: Photo by Mar
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
- 66 - Chapter 5: Refuge Administra
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
- 74 - Literature Cited Lockwood, R
Page 86 and 87:
- 76 - Literature Cited University
Page 88 and 89:
- 78 - Literature Cited (This page
Page 90 and 91: - 80 - Glossary protection on servi
Page 92 and 93: - 82 - Glossary Geographic Informat
Page 94 and 95: - 84 - Glossary responsible for the
Page 96 and 97: - 86 - Glossary “candidate specie
Page 98 and 99: - 88 - Glossary (This page intentio
Page 100 and 101: - 90 - List of Preparers John Eaton
Page 102 and 103: - 92 - Appendices (This page intent
Page 104 and 105: - 94 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws se
Page 106 and 107: - 96 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws Na
Page 108 and 109: - 98 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws No
Page 110 and 111: - 100 - Appendix A: Relevant Laws T
Page 112 and 113: CAT Content Analysis Team November
Page 114 and 115: Eastern Massachusetts National Wild
Page 164 and 165: - 154 - Appendix B: U.S. Forest Ser
Page 166 and 167: - 158 - Appendix C: Responses to Su
Page 180 and 181: - 172 - Appendix D: Species Lists B
Page 182 and 183: - 174 - Appendix D: Species Lists C
Page 184 and 185: - 176 - Appendix D: Species Lists 7
Page 186 and 187: - 178 - Appendix D: Species Lists T
Page 188 and 189: - 180 - Appendix D: Species Lists C
Page 190 and 191:
- 182 - Appendix D: Species Lists o
Page 192 and 193:
- 184 - Appendix D: Species Lists M
Page 194 and 195:
- 186 - Appendix D: Species Lists H
Page 196 and 197:
- 188 - Appendix D: Species Lists A
Page 198 and 199:
- 190 - Appendix D: Species Lists C
Page 200 and 201:
- 192 - Appendix D: Species Lists L
Page 202 and 203:
- 194 - Appendix D: Species Lists E
Page 204 and 205:
- 196 - Appendix D: Species Lists R
Page 206 and 207:
- 198 - Appendix D: Species Lists L
Page 208 and 209:
- 200 - Appendix D: Species Lists U
Page 210 and 211:
- 202 - Appendix E: RONS and MMS Pr
Page 212 and 213:
- 204 - Appendix E: RONS and MMS (T
Page 214 and 215:
- 206 - Appendix F: Staffing Charts
Page 216 and 217:
Appendix F: Staffing Charts - 208 -
Page 218 and 219:
Appendix F: Staffing Charts Compati
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Appendix F: Staffing Charts Special
Page 224 and 225:
Appendix F: Staffing Charts Public
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Appendix F: Staffing Charts Determi
Page 230 and 231:
Appendix F: Staffing Charts Anticip
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Appendix F: Staffing Charts and Wil
Page 238 and 239:
Appendix F: Staffing Charts non-Ser
Page 240 and 241:
Appendix F: Staffing Charts before
Page 242 and 243:
Appendix F: Staffing Charts wildlif
show all

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?