Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Eastern Massachusetts National Wildlife Refuge Complex Draft CCP/EA November 26, 2003
Some respondents point out the economic benefits of horseback riding, stating that equine
activities are engaged in by a large number of Massachusetts citizens and also make a
significant contribution to the Massachusetts economy. For example, they assert that equine
agriculture provides over $200 million per year in direct spending into the Massachusetts
economy, over 5,000 jobs and more than $13.2 million in state and local tax revenues.
Limiting horseback riding would harm the economy.
Equestrians state that they oppose expansion of the refuge’s boundaries as long as it limits
horseback riding.
Dog-Walking
Many respondents assert that given the popularity and demand for areas to walk dogs, and
the fact that parts of the refuge have been used responsibly for decades by dog-walkers; FWS
should make part of the refuge available for this pastime. These dog walking enthusiasts
request that leashed dog-walking be allowed on refuge trails in appropriate areas, and that
strict fines are in place for anyone releasing a dog or failing to pick up after their animal.
Others are willing to allow an exclusion of dogs during the most sensitive times, when
wildlife surveys identify an impact on nesting birds or other animal life. Many of these
respondents view dog-walking as meditative and a way of connecting to the natural beauty of
the earth, something that is consistent with refuge goals. These respondents assert that
without substantial evidence that dog-walkers are threatening the integrity of the refuge it is
unjust and an act of discrimination to prohibit dog-walking. On the other hand, one
respondent would like to see dogs banned from the refuge, stating that many dog owners
don’t obey leash rules to the detriment of wildlife, and further, even on a leash dogs frighten
animals.
Birdwatching
Birdwatchers and nature photographers are concerned that they will be confined strictly to
trails when observing wildlife, while hunters would not. If hunters are allowed off trail, they
assert, birders should be allowed off trail as well.
Trapping
Some respondents ask that the Refuge be open to beaver and muskrat trapping, asserting that
modern traps are instant and humane, and arguing that small game threatens children, pets,
and livestock, and that beavers “cause extensive property damage.”
Some respondents ask whether and under what circumstances which furbearers could be
trapped, and what constitutes an invasive species and appropriate control methods.
Some respondents oppose trapping on the grounds that it is inhumane; other respondents
perceive trapping as ham-fisted interference in natural systems that function best on their
own.
Summary of Comments 25