23.12.2012 Views

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix G: <strong>Final</strong> Compatibility Determinations<br />

Justification: The National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (P.L. 105-<br />

57) identifies six legitimate <strong>and</strong> appropriate uses of wildlife refuges: wildlife observation<br />

<strong>and</strong> wildlife photography, environmental education, interpretation, hunting, <strong>and</strong> fishing.<br />

These priority public uses are dependent upon healthy wildlife populations. Where these<br />

uses are determined to be compatible, they are to receive enhanced consideration over<br />

other uses in planning <strong>and</strong> management.<br />

The majority of visitors to the refuge are there to view the wildlife <strong>and</strong> upl<strong>and</strong>, wetl<strong>and</strong>,<br />

<strong>and</strong> grassl<strong>and</strong> habitat areas. Some visit to develop an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of natural or cultural<br />

history. This visitation is in accordance with a wildlife-oriented activity <strong>and</strong> is an<br />

acceptable secondary use. There will be some visitor impacts from this activity, such as<br />

trampling vegetation (Kuss <strong>and</strong> Hall, 1991) <strong>and</strong> disturbance to wildlife near trails (Klein,<br />

1993 <strong>and</strong> Burger, 1981), but the knowledge, appreciation <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

management gained by visitors will provide support for the <strong>Service</strong>. The long-term<br />

benefits gained through wildlife observation <strong>and</strong> photography activities outweigh the<br />

impacts listed above.<br />

These activities will not materially interfere with or detract from the mission of the<br />

National <strong>Wildlife</strong> Refuge System or the purposes for which the refuge was established.<br />

Literature Cited:<br />

Burger, J. 1981. The Effect of Human Activity on Birds at a Coastal Bay. Biol. Conserv.<br />

21:231-241.<br />

Klein, M.L. 1993. Waterbird Behavioral Response to Human Disturbances. Wildl. Soc.<br />

Bull. 21:31-39.<br />

Kuss, F.R. <strong>and</strong> C.N. Hall. 1991. Ground Flora Trampling Studies: Five Years After<br />

Closure. Environ. Manage. 15(5):715-727.<br />

Signature - Refuge Manager: /s/ Elizabeth A. Herl<strong>and</strong> 12/21/2004<br />

(Signature <strong>and</strong> Date)<br />

Concurrence - Regional Chief: /s/ Anthony D. Léger 12/27/2004<br />

(Signature <strong>and</strong> Date)<br />

M<strong>and</strong>atory 15-year Reevaluation Date: December 27, 2019<br />

Comprehensive Conservation Plan - 235 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!