26.07.2021 Views

General Chemistry Principles, Patterns, and Applications, 2011

General Chemistry Principles, Patterns, and Applications, 2011

General Chemistry Principles, Patterns, and Applications, 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ka = [H+][HCO2-][HCO2H] = (1.00 ´10 - 7 + x)x0.150 - x<br />

Because the ionization constant Ka is small, x is likely to be small compared with the initial concentration<br />

of formic acid: (0.150 − x) M ≈ 0.150 M. Moreover, [H + ] due to the autoionization of water (1.00 × 10 − 7<br />

M)<br />

is likely to be negligible compared with [H + ] due to the dissociation of formic acid: (1.00 × 10 − 7<br />

+ x) M<br />

≈ x M. Inserting these values into the equilibrium constant expression <strong>and</strong> solving for x,<br />

Ka = x20.150x =1.8 ´10 - 4 = 5.2 ´10 - 3<br />

We can now calculate the concentrations of the species present in a 0.150 M formic acid solution by<br />

inserting this value of x into the expressions in the last line of the table:<br />

[HCO2H ][HCO2][H +] = (0.150 - x) M = 0.145 M = x = 5.2<br />

´10 - 3 M = (1.00 ´10 - 7 + x) M = 5.2 ´10 - 3 M<br />

Thus the pH of the solution is –log(5.2 × 10 − 3 ) = 2.28. We can also use these concentrations to calculate<br />

the fraction of the original acid that is ionized. In this case, the percent ionization is the ratio of [H + ] (or<br />

[HCO2 − ]) to the analytical concentration, multiplied by 100 to give a percentage:<br />

percent ionization = [H+]CHA ´100 = 5.2 ´10 - 3 M0.150 ´100 = 3.5%<br />

Always check to make sure that any simplifying assumption was valid. As a general rule of thumb,<br />

approximations such as those used here are valid only if the quantity being neglected is no more than<br />

about 5% of the quantity to which it is being added or from which it is being subtracted. If the quantity<br />

that was neglected is much greater than about 5%, then the approximation is probably not valid, <strong>and</strong> you<br />

should go back <strong>and</strong> solve the problem using the quadratic formula. In the previous demonstration, both<br />

simplifying assumptions were justified: the percent ionization is only 3.5%, which is well below the<br />

approximately 5% limit, <strong>and</strong> the 1.00 × 10 − 7<br />

M [H + ] due to the autoionization of water is much, much less<br />

than the 5.2 × 10 − 3<br />

M [H + ] due to the ionization of formic acid.<br />

As a general rule, the [H + ] contribution due to the autoionization of water can be ignored as long as the<br />

product of the acid or the base ionization constant <strong>and</strong> the analytical concentration of the acid or the base<br />

is at least 10 times greater than the [H + ] or [OH − ] from the autoionization of water—that is, if<br />

Equation 16.45<br />

K a C HA ≥ 10(1.00 × 10 −7 ) = 1.0 × 10 −6<br />

or<br />

Equation 16.46<br />

K b C B ≥ 10(1.00 × 10 −7 ) = 1.0 × 10 −6<br />

Saylor URL: http://www.saylor.org/books<br />

Saylor.org<br />

1484

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!