24.12.2012 Views

That Someone Guilty Be Punished - International Center for ...

That Someone Guilty Be Punished - International Center for ...

That Someone Guilty Be Punished - International Center for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Republika Srpska (31.9%). See South East Europe Public Agenda Survey, January–February 2002,<br />

Bosnia and Herzegovina (Federation), p. 19; South East Europe Public Agenda Survey, Republic of<br />

Srpska, January-February 2002, p. 17. In contrast, among those residing in the Federation, where<br />

a majority of victims of wartime atrocities reside, 50.5 percent reported that they trusted the ICTY.<br />

South East Europe Public Agenda Survey, January–February 2002, Bosnia and Herzegovina (Federation),<br />

p. 26. For Republika Srpska, the percentage of respondents who said they trusted the ICTY<br />

was only 3.6. South East Europe Public Agenda Survey, Republic of Srpska, January–February 2002,<br />

p. 24.<br />

784. See “Bosnian Serb war criminal fakes toothache to escape,” Reuters, May 25, 2007, at http://<br />

www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSL25390302. Three years after his escape, Stanković<br />

remains at large.<br />

785. The most common concern voiced by Bosniak victims is that sentences imposed by the<br />

BWCC are too short in relation to the crimes committed, whereas Serbs are likely to say that Serb<br />

perpetrators receive harsher sentences. In addition, just as Bosnian citizens are troubled by apparent<br />

inconsistencies among sentences imposed by the ICTY, “it is very difficult [ <strong>for</strong> them] to make<br />

sense of disparities in sentences” imposed by the BWCC. Interview with Dubravka Piotrovski, then<br />

ABA CEELI, Sarajevo, Nov. 29, 2006. Some fault the BWCC <strong>for</strong> devoting too much time prosecuting<br />

lower level perpetrators, e.g., interview with Emir Suljagić, author, Sarajevo, July 14, 2009.<br />

786. “Public Perceptions of the work of the Court and Prosecutor’s Office of BiH,” Prism Research<br />

<strong>for</strong> the Registry of the Court of BiH and The Registry of the Prosecutor’s Office of BiH, p. 10, July<br />

2008. Although this survey was not limited to perceptions of the BWCC and the SDWC, many of<br />

its questions pertained specifically to war crimes prosecutions be<strong>for</strong>e the State Court. The study<br />

found, moreover, that the most common association of BiH citizens with the words “Office of the<br />

Prosecutor of BiH” was “(war) crimes and criminals.” Id., p. 14.<br />

787. Id. As we note below, the Court of BiH has been challenged by Republika Srpska President<br />

Milorad Dodik.<br />

788. See Final Report of the <strong>International</strong> Criminal Law Services (ICLS) Experts on the Sustainable<br />

Transition of the Registry and <strong>International</strong> Donor Support to the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina<br />

and the Prosecutor’s Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2009 (ICLS Report), available at<br />

http://www.iclsfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/icls-bih-finalreportwebsitecorrected.<br />

pdf.<br />

789. Interview with Mirsad Tokača, director, Research and Documentation <strong>Center</strong>, Sarajevo, July<br />

24, 2009.<br />

790. Interview with the Human Rights Department (OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina),<br />

Sarajevo, June 8, 2007.<br />

791. See generally ICTJ, The War Crimes Chamber in Bosnia and Herzegovina: From Hybrid to<br />

Domestic Court (2008); Human Rights Watch, Narrowing the Impunity Gap: Trials be<strong>for</strong>e Bosnia’s<br />

War Crimes Chamber (Feb. 2007). Concerns highlighted by both ICTJ and HRW in their respective<br />

reports include the BWCC’s over-use of closed sessions in some early trials, the need <strong>for</strong> the<br />

prosecutor to develop a strategy <strong>for</strong> selecting cases, and the need <strong>for</strong> more effective outreach by<br />

the court. As discussed above, a July 2008 survey suggests that the chamber has received more<br />

positive reviews among experts who closely follow its work than the Court of BiH has generally<br />

received from the Bosnian public. But international experts have raised a range of concerns about<br />

196 NOTES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!