- Page 1:
That Someone Guilty Be Punished The
- Page 5 and 6:
That Someone Guilty Be Punished The
- Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents Acknowledgments 7
- Page 9 and 10:
Acknowledgments Diane Orentlicher,
- Page 11 and 12:
Methodology This report draws upon
- Page 13 and 14:
I. Introduction On May 25, 1993, th
- Page 15 and 16:
Victims’ Justice The Security Cou
- Page 17 and 18:
in the . Srebrenica genocide. Many
- Page 19 and 20:
Journalist Nidžara Ahmetašević r
- Page 21 and 22:
survive “ethnic cleansing.” Muh
- Page 23:
ings [of Bosnia’s judiciary were]
- Page 26 and 27:
from territories under Serb control
- Page 28 and 29:
C. Peace and Justice If the ICTY fa
- Page 30 and 31:
groups are approximately the same s
- Page 32 and 33:
F. Cooperation by Bosnian Authoriti
- Page 34 and 35:
Women [who were captured by Serb so
- Page 36 and 37:
Tribunal’s expressive function in
- Page 38 and 39:
We found this view to be nearly uni
- Page 40 and 41: Branko Todorović, who heads the He
- Page 42 and 43: full establishment of healthy and c
- Page 44 and 45: Sali-Teržić believes that justice
- Page 46 and 47: committed war crimes, a notion that
- Page 48 and 49: J. “Justice Isn’t Just in Legal
- Page 50 and 51: Vehid Šehić, who believes the ICT
- Page 52 and 53: Because our own research did not in
- Page 54 and 55: imposed on two other perpetrators c
- Page 56 and 57: feared it would be reduced to half
- Page 58 and 59: Enumerating victims’ frustrations
- Page 60 and 61: While some of our Bosnian interlocu
- Page 62 and 63: 2. Biljana Plavšić On October 2,
- Page 64 and 65: Others interviewed during the same
- Page 66 and 67: executions, the execution in Korić
- Page 68 and 69: D. Significant Verdicts, Other Ruli
- Page 70 and 71: at least 2012; another, Ratko Mladi
- Page 72 and 73: could be legally attributed to Serb
- Page 74 and 75: Hasečić leads, the Association of
- Page 76 and 77: ings … went before any expectatio
- Page 78 and 79: enica survivor Kada Hotić describe
- Page 80 and 81: they are in the shadow of Karadži
- Page 82 and 83: First, individuals who had been for
- Page 84 and 85: Kovačević, who was under indictme
- Page 86 and 87: says it was “not the major reason
- Page 88 and 89: their names are not publicly disclo
- Page 92 and 93: emorse for crimes committed in thei
- Page 94 and 95: y members of all three major ethnic
- Page 96 and 97: 2. Srebrenica Understandably, many
- Page 98 and 99: extended to the victims, their fami
- Page 100 and 101: 4. Contextual considerations Our in
- Page 102 and 103: a journalist who directs the non-go
- Page 104 and 105: Bosnia was necessarily extremely li
- Page 106 and 107: there was such a silence ... that y
- Page 108 and 109: of this initiative submitted a draf
- Page 110 and 111: the ICTY, the UN Security Council c
- Page 112 and 113: In larger perspective, to the exten
- Page 114 and 115: face” in having to seek internati
- Page 116 and 117: 1. Impetus for change Although the
- Page 118 and 119: sentative of a new national crimina
- Page 120 and 121: While the ICTY and OHR were satisfi
- Page 122 and 123: legal framework for Rule 11 bis tra
- Page 124 and 125: cially the prosecutorial office of
- Page 126 and 127: ing and reviewing large volumes of
- Page 128 and 129: d. Applying lessons learned from IC
- Page 130 and 131: This is not to minimize the ICTY’
- Page 132 and 133: elieves, Bosnia could have gone far
- Page 134 and 135: Bosnia represents an advance that m
- Page 137 and 138: Notes 1. Introduction 1. See Chapte
- Page 139 and 140: fiction. Marlise Simons, “Karadzi
- Page 141 and 142:
49. Aryeh Neier, War Crimes, p. 124
- Page 143 and 144:
72. See id., pp. 232-38. 73. Goldst
- Page 145 and 146:
101. Philip Shenon, “War Crimes S
- Page 147 and 148:
124. The Research and Documentation
- Page 149 and 150:
148. The ICTY Appeals Chamber summa
- Page 151 and 152:
174. Interview with Branko Todorovi
- Page 153 and 154:
204. Interview with Ðoren Kalajdž
- Page 155 and 156:
234. Interview with Fadil Budnjo, p
- Page 157 and 158:
Gotovina be handed over to Hague?,
- Page 159 and 160:
Simo Zarić (Jan. 21, 2004), Stevan
- Page 161 and 162:
een convicted of genocide. The ICTY
- Page 163 and 164:
332. See Monika Nalepa, “Why Do T
- Page 165 and 166:
367. Daria Sito-Sučić, “Muslim
- Page 167 and 168:
should be considered in mitigation,
- Page 169 and 170:
411. Interview with Nerma Jelačić
- Page 171 and 172:
449. As reported in Simon Jennings,
- Page 173 and 174:
481. Interview with Ivan Lovrenovi
- Page 175 and 176:
512. As noted earlier, Karadžić e
- Page 177 and 178:
elocated within the country. Interv
- Page 179 and 180:
knew of a witness who, by virtue of
- Page 181 and 182:
y September 2003. While RS authorit
- Page 183 and 184:
634. Interview with Mirsad Duratovi
- Page 185 and 186:
665. In Chapter IV.C we discuss man
- Page 187 and 188:
and mechanisms associated with a so
- Page 189 and 190:
713. The Rome Agreement signed by t
- Page 191 and 192:
253. See also William W. Burke-Whit
- Page 193 and 194:
have been much more difficult. See
- Page 195 and 196:
own work. See Seventh annual report
- Page 197 and 198:
771. See id., p. 280. Other element
- Page 199 and 200:
the Court. See, e.g., Final Report
- Page 201 and 202:
transparency of the Chamber in thes
- Page 203 and 204:
of redundancy in the files.” Davi
- Page 205 and 206:
863. Id., § 4.1.3 (internal citati
- Page 207 and 208:
independent, impartial and professi
- Page 209:
919. Interview with Dobrila Govedar
- Page 212:
Open Society Institute The Open Soc