That Someone Guilty Be Punished - International Center for ...
That Someone Guilty Be Punished - International Center for ...
That Someone Guilty Be Punished - International Center for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Vehid Šehić, who believes the ICTY has “absolutely” achieved what he hoped it would within<br />
the limits of its judicial role, 231 and Mirsad Tokača, who says he is “80 percent satisfied” with<br />
what the ICTY has achieved. 232 At the other end are citizens like Fadil Budnjo, who says that so<br />
many years after the ICTY was established, “very little is left of what we could have expected.” 233<br />
Like others who described their disappointed hopes, however, Budnjo added: “All in all, we<br />
still believe it was positive to have it established.” 234<br />
In this chapter, we assess the extent to which Bosnians perceive the ICTY as having<br />
achieved many of the goals identified in the previous chapter. We separately address (in Chapter<br />
V) the degree to which the ICTY’s judgments have contributed to acknowledgement of<br />
wrongdoing by members of each of Bosnia’s ethnic communities. We also separately address<br />
the ICTY’s role in contributing to Bosnian capacity to prosecute war crimes. 235<br />
To the extent possible, we have tried to link reported perceptions of ICTY successes,<br />
partial successes, and failures to specific aspects of the Tribunal’s per<strong>for</strong>mance. In doing so,<br />
we do not mean to imply that the ICTY was invariably at fault in the manner suggested by our<br />
Bosnian interlocutors. In some instances, we describe widespread perceptions that the ICTY<br />
has erred even when the source of concern may involve actions that lie beyond the control<br />
of an international court or that are compelled by international standards of fair process. We<br />
nonetheless believe that it is helpful <strong>for</strong> those involved in making policy determinations bearing<br />
on international justice—whether prosecutors, judges, or the diplomatic community—to<br />
understand how the actions of a tribunal like the ICTY are perceived by populations most<br />
affected by its work. If nothing else, this may usefully shape public outreach ef<strong>for</strong>ts of international<br />
courts.<br />
A. Ethnic Fault Lines<br />
As we have suggested elsewhere in this report, many Bosnians continue to embody the multiethnic<br />
society <strong>for</strong> which Bosnia was known be<strong>for</strong>e the 1990s conflict, in which bonds of<br />
affinity were neither determined by nor defined in terms of ethnicity. In our interviews in<br />
Bosnia, particularly in Sarajevo, we would be hard-pressed to surmise many of our interlocutors’<br />
ethnic identity from their observations about the ICTY. Thus any general claims about<br />
different perceptions of the ICTY among Bosnia’s ethnic groups would be overgeneralizations<br />
if not appropriately qualified.<br />
Yet <strong>for</strong> many Bosnians, overall perceptions of the ICTY are at least in significant part<br />
a function of the ethnic group to which they belong. 236 In a 2006 interview, Bosnian lawyer<br />
Dubravka Piotrovski characterized the perceptions of the country’s three major ethnic groups<br />
regarding the work of the ICTY this way: “It seems that Bosniaks are more or less satisfied,<br />
Croats somewhat, and Serbs not at all.” 237 While others might characterize the degree of each<br />
48 ACHIEVEMENTS, FAILURES, AND PERFORMANCE