That Someone Guilty Be Punished - International Center for ...
That Someone Guilty Be Punished - International Center for ...
That Someone Guilty Be Punished - International Center for ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2. Biljana Plavšić<br />
On October 2, 2002, Biljana Plavšić, who had served as a member of the Bosnian Serbs’ Presidency<br />
during the war, pleaded guilty to the crime against humanity of persecution. 343 Although<br />
seven defendants had by then entered guilty pleas be<strong>for</strong>e the ICTY, this was the first time that<br />
such a high-ranking Serb official had done so and, perhaps more important, had expressed<br />
remorse. 344 When she entered her plea, Plavšić said:<br />
To achieve any reconciliation or lasting peace in BH, serious violations of humanitarian<br />
law during the war must be acknowledged by those who bear responsibility—regardless<br />
of their ethnic group. This acknowledgement is an essential first step. 345<br />
Many believed that Plavšić’s confession could have a catalytic effect on “the process of<br />
reconciliation” in Bosnia, as one observer put it. 346 The Humanitarian Law <strong>Center</strong>, a leading<br />
NGO in Serbia, welcomed the confession, noting that it “opens the way to the reconciliation of<br />
individuals and ethnic groups, and to restoring the dignity of the victims.” 347 At her sentencing<br />
hearing two and one-half months later, an extraordinary line-up of witnesses, ranging from<br />
<strong>for</strong>mer U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright to Nobel laureate Elie Wiesel, hailed the<br />
potential significance of her plea as a gesture of acknowledgement that could advance reconciliation.<br />
348 So, too, did the prosecutor. As the Trial Chamber noted, “The Prosecution states<br />
that ‘it accepts that Mrs. Plavšić’s plea of guilty and acceptance of responsibility represents an<br />
unprecedented contribution to the establishment of truth and a significant ef<strong>for</strong>t toward the<br />
advancement of reconciliation.’” 349<br />
In Bosnia, reactions to the courtroom proceeding “ranged from pleasant surprise to<br />
suspicion that the tribunal somehow compromised its values by making a deal” with Plavšić. 350<br />
While some agreed with expert witnesses who testified that Plavšić’s confession could be a<br />
watershed, others doubted her sincerity. Srebrenica survivor Munira Subašić thought Plavšić<br />
had confessed “so she can get a lighter sentence” 351 (a suspicion later confirmed by Plavšić<br />
herself). Another survivor, Sabra Kolenović, noted that Plavšić had stopped short of actually<br />
apologizing. 352 Emir Suljagić, who spent much of the war in Srebrenica, did not detect even a<br />
“note of apology” in Plavšić’s words. 353 Carla Del Ponte, who was the ICTY prosecutor at the<br />
time of this hearing, would later write that she, too, was horrified when she heard Plavšić’s<br />
confession. Del Ponte described the courtroom scene this way:<br />
[Plavšić] got up during her sentencing hearing and read out a statement full of generalistic<br />
mea culpas but lacking compelling detail. I listened to her admissions in horror,<br />
knowing she was saying nothing. 354<br />
60 ACHIEVEMENTS, FAILURES, AND PERFORMANCE