25.12.2012 Views

ADAPTING TRISTRAM SHANDY by Adria Young Submitted in ...

ADAPTING TRISTRAM SHANDY by Adria Young Submitted in ...

ADAPTING TRISTRAM SHANDY by Adria Young Submitted in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

contention among the film's producers and f<strong>in</strong>anciers. The meta-commentary that such<br />

scenes provide is whether the historical scenes are even conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g. While the cast and<br />

crew watch the filmed battle scenes, Coogan says “Mel Gibson's not go<strong>in</strong>g to lose any<br />

sleep” (a joke, s<strong>in</strong>ce the scenes are not conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g). Brydon remarks, “I'm lead<strong>in</strong>g<br />

literally tens of men.” And comments on the historical <strong>in</strong>accuracy of the costumes, which<br />

are “out of period, about 50 years out of date,” cause the costume designer to cry. Foley-<br />

Dawson argues that the film “shuns any pretence of historical accuracy” (150) <strong>by</strong><br />

parody<strong>in</strong>g the conventions of historical dramas and the concern for authenticity. David<br />

Ingolds<strong>by</strong>, played <strong>by</strong> Mark Williams, the low-paid “historical accuracy adviser” on the<br />

film, satirizes the “obsession with 'superficial' historical accuracy” <strong>in</strong> adaptations (Foley-<br />

Dawson 150). He is shown adjust<strong>in</strong>g tricorn hats and comment<strong>in</strong>g on the wardrobe.<br />

Later, he cries out that, “We wouldn't be <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a pantomime.” And<br />

yet, the film itself is a pantomime of these k<strong>in</strong>ds of historical representations on film.<br />

Coogan obsesses over the height of his shoes <strong>in</strong> relation to Brydon's shoes (s<strong>in</strong>ce Coogan<br />

should appear taller on screen as the “lead<strong>in</strong>g man”) but the costume designer is unable to<br />

modify the wardrobe on account of historicity. And, because the f<strong>in</strong>anciers are concerned<br />

about the film's overall marketability as an adaptation, the deliberation over whether to<br />

film the expensive and elaborate battle scenes because they will come across as<br />

“contrived and awkward” <strong>in</strong>stead of accurate (Gow 10) mocks the entire premise of<br />

historical re-enactment films at their core. What the film accomplishes through its<br />

participation with these generic expectations are moments of hypermedial awareness: we<br />

are watch<strong>in</strong>g an adaptation about an adaptation, and it is made to be trivial s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

historical accuracy is of course impossible. In the end, the battle scenes w<strong>in</strong>d up on the<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!