Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Isis</strong> <strong>Papers</strong><br />
Unified Field <strong>The</strong>ory Psychiatry<br />
itself: its lack of conceptual clarity. This <strong>the</strong>oretical ambiguity is <strong>the</strong><br />
core of <strong>the</strong> conflict that confronts psychiany. As pragmatic eclectics,<br />
uncertain that we have put <strong>the</strong> pieces of <strong>the</strong> picture <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r correctly,<br />
we can never be confident that we can distinguish between <strong>the</strong> sick<br />
patient and <strong>the</strong> sick society. Psychiatry's contribution <strong>to</strong> what it means<br />
<strong>to</strong> be a person is its most powerful aspect. That contribution cannot<br />
be under psychiany's control in a free society. However, <strong>the</strong><br />
profession has a responsibility for <strong>the</strong> hidden values in its <strong>the</strong>ories and<br />
<strong>the</strong>rapies, which contribute <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> shaping of 'contemporary<br />
consciousness.' It is in <strong>the</strong> issues surrounding <strong>the</strong> subject of women<br />
that perhaps <strong>the</strong> most convincing attack on <strong>the</strong> hidden values in<br />
psychiany has been made.<br />
Dr. S<strong>to</strong>ne continued this discussion, asking if <strong>the</strong>se issues cut deeper<br />
in<strong>to</strong> American psychiatry than racism and homosexuality:<br />
As far as I can see, <strong>the</strong> case against psychiatry as it regards women is<br />
far more damaging, requires far more than a minor adjustment of our<br />
composite sketch; indeed, it compels each of us <strong>to</strong> reexamine not only<br />
our <strong>the</strong>ories, but also our lives and relationships. <strong>The</strong>re can be no new<br />
psychology of women that does not require a new psychology of men.<br />
That makes necessary a new conception of all our human values and<br />
all <strong>the</strong> paradigms of psychiatry. Psychiatry does not stand outside of<br />
his<strong>to</strong>ry or morality, but how do psychiatrists decide which his<strong>to</strong>ry and<br />
which morality <strong>to</strong> accept? <strong>The</strong> rules about which his<strong>to</strong>ry and which<br />
morality <strong>to</strong> accept are not clearly described in <strong>the</strong> biologic,<br />
psychodynamic, and behavioral paradigms. What is required of us is<br />
moral ambition. Until our composite sketch becomes a true portrait<br />
of humanity, we must live with our uncertainty. We will grope; we<br />
will struggle; and our compassion may be our only guide and comfort.<br />
Originally, my essay began with <strong>the</strong> statement, "It is clear <strong>to</strong> many that<br />
grave problems are confronting <strong>the</strong> field of psychiatry at <strong>the</strong>oretical and<br />
conceptual levels. This crisis has important implications for treatment as<br />
well as problems encountered in formulating diagnostic categories as<br />
evidenced in <strong>the</strong> controversies surrounding <strong>the</strong> task of developing Diag·<br />
nostic and Statistical Manual III." But who better should state <strong>the</strong><br />
problems facing psychiatry in America than an outgoing president of <strong>the</strong><br />
American Psychiatric Association? Indeed, who would be more readily<br />
believed than he?<br />
While not accepting all that was said by Dr. S<strong>to</strong>ne (most specifically<br />
his view of sexism as a more problematic issue than racism), I do share<br />
his awareness of a floundering chaos in psychiatry's current <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />
and conceptual state. It was this very awareness that, led me <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
consideration of a unified field <strong>the</strong>ory in psychiatry.<br />
<strong>The</strong> concept of a unified field <strong>the</strong>ory is derived from <strong>the</strong> work of <strong>the</strong><br />
great physicist Alben Einstein (March 14, 1879 - April 18, 1955).<br />
Einstein, a ma<strong>the</strong>matical physicist, <strong>the</strong> most recognized and highly<br />
renowned scientist in <strong>the</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ry of Western civilization, spent <strong>the</strong> greater<br />
portion of his productive years in search of a unified field <strong>the</strong>ory, a <strong>the</strong>ory<br />
that, in ma<strong>the</strong>matical terms (by a single set of equations), would combine<br />
all of <strong>the</strong> different manifestations of energy phenomena in <strong>the</strong> universe.<br />
Einstein studied <strong>the</strong> force of gravity and produced <strong>the</strong> General <strong>The</strong>ory<br />
of Relativity. He studied <strong>the</strong> forces of electromagnetism and produced<br />
<strong>the</strong> Special <strong>The</strong>ory ofRelati vity, which became a more accurate yardstick<br />
for measuring <strong>the</strong> characteristics of <strong>the</strong> physical world. <strong>The</strong>n, Einstein<br />
questioned <strong>the</strong> possibility of generalizing <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>the</strong>matical foundations<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>to</strong> derive not only <strong>the</strong> properties of <strong>the</strong> gravitational field,<br />
but also those of <strong>the</strong> electromagnetic field.<br />
His work is reviewed in Ronald Clarke's 1971 Einstein: <strong>The</strong> Life and<br />
Times. In Einstein's own words:<br />
For years, it has been my greatest ambition <strong>to</strong> resolve <strong>the</strong> duality of<br />
natural laws in<strong>to</strong> unity. This duality lies in <strong>the</strong> fact that physicists have<br />
hi<strong>the</strong>r<strong>to</strong> been compelled <strong>to</strong> postulate two sets of laws- those which<br />
control gravitation and those which control <strong>the</strong> phenomena of<br />
electricity and magnetism ... Many physicists have suspected that two<br />
sets of laws must be based upon one genenl law. but nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />
experiment nor <strong>the</strong>ory has until now, succeeded in formulating this<br />
law .... <strong>The</strong> relativity <strong>the</strong>ory reduced <strong>to</strong> one formula all laws which<br />
govern space, time and gravitation, and thus it corresponded <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
demand for simplification of our physical concepts. <strong>The</strong> purpose of<br />
my work is <strong>to</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r this simplification, and particularly <strong>to</strong> reduce <strong>to</strong><br />
one formula <strong>the</strong> explanation of <strong>the</strong> field of grllvity and <strong>the</strong> field of<br />
electromagnetism. For this reason I call it a contribution <strong>to</strong> 'a unified<br />
field <strong>the</strong>ory' ... Now, but only now, we know that <strong>the</strong> force which<br />
moves electrons in <strong>the</strong>ir ellipse about <strong>the</strong> nuclei of a<strong>to</strong>ms is <strong>the</strong> same<br />
force which moves our earth in its annual course about <strong>the</strong> sun, and is<br />
40<br />
41