The Isis Papers: The Keys to the Colors

The Isis Papers
bullfights. Bullfighting became a prominent sport in Spain after the
Moors (Black men) finally had been chased out of Europe, back across
the Mediterranean, into Africa. The Moors had conquered Spain for seven
hundred years. By the time they left, the once white population had
become dark (via the dominant Black genetic material): dark skin, dark
hair and dark eyes. Cirlot' s A Dictionary of Symbols states that the bull
as an historic symbol represents the superiority of the Aryan over the
Negro. This could not possibly be the logically correct meaning of the
symbol. If this analysis were correct, there would be rio need for "whites"
to kill a black bull with a sword. Obviously, a more logical and accurate
interpretation of the bull symbol is the opposite ofCirlot's interpretation
- the bull represents the superiority or genetic dominance of the Blacks
over the genetic recessive whites. Again, the sword used to kill the black
bull, as Cirlot also noted, comes into play as the weapon of the "forces of
light" over the "forces of darkness." The sword signifies the weapon of
the possessor of the white genitals or recessive white genetic material,
against the dominant Black genitals and their genetic material.
By the fourth century A.D., Jesus had been changed in color from Black
"Jesus" to white "Christ" (then to be known as "Jesus Christ" or simply,
"Christ"). This was the conscious or unconscious attempt to further
repress from the collective white consciousness the true source of white
anxiety and fear - the Black male and his genitals. Instead of a lynched
Black Jesus, a frail, weak, effeminate, suffering and dying white Christ
was hung against a black wooden cross as the dominant symbol in the
religious practices of the white supremacy system/culture. Instead of the
woolly, kinky head of the "Lamb of God," there was the straight, almost
blond hair of the white Christ hung up against the black wooden cross.
However, this symbolic image achieved a more important goal. In a
single-picture-paragraph it states, "The weak, genetic recessive, white
male, will be destroyed genetically-speaking, when up against the whiteannihilating,
genetically dominant, Black male genital apparatus (the
cross)."
Arnold Toynbee, in Mankind and Mother Earth, states,
Symbolism of Christ
Fifteenth Century western Christians were obsessed with the horror
of death (the antitheses of the Pharonic Egyptian's pleasurable
anticipation of a post-mortem eternity), and they were fascinated by
the physical suffering of Christ on the Cross. Contemporary western
painters, engravers and sculptors - especially in the Transalpine
countries - extended their art to portray these themes with gruesome
realism.
The 15th century also heralded the Europeans • (the whites) world travel
to conquer and control the entire non-white world, in order to prevent
white genetic annihilation and death. This horrendous fear was then
translated in European art.
Joel Kovel, in his book White Racism (A Psychohistory) writes:
Christianity spread over theW est and created a community out of what
had been barbarian splinters. It did this through the power of a
concrete institution, the Catholic Church, It was the church's
immediate influence that held aloft the subliminatory ideal of Christ
and, through· that ideal, gave Europeans a scaffold of identification
with which to bind themselves into a unified civilization.
Men, however, remained men, tom and driven by their obscure
passions into striving for greed and domination which culture could
scarcely regulate. Intense aggression resisted the Church's
unification, continued to plague European culture, and delayed its
growth. Within the original world-view, there was no way to
rationalize or include the striving for greed and domination that
persisted within civilization. Mter al~ the Christian revolution was
superimposed upon a basically dominative way of life. It could only
account for the guilt that arose from the dominative style of society by
turning away from the given world.
What Kovel fails to understand is that the fundamental reason Catholic
Christianity, from its early days of European organization and interpretation
of the Jesus theology, was able to unite the global white collective
(then the warring white tribes of Europe) was because of the cross
symbolism and the deep meaning it projected. When Christianity
projected "the cross," especially the cross with the limp, pale body of
70
71