28.12.2012 Views

A “Toolbox” for Forensic Engineers

A “Toolbox” for Forensic Engineers

A “Toolbox” for Forensic Engineers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Establishing the Load Transfer Path 81<br />

Figure 3.16 Unused bracket tested to destruction in the compression test. The<br />

fracture is virtually identical to the accident bracket.<br />

wheel being pushed inward. The defendant’s expert then obtained an unused<br />

bracket from the manufacturer, fitted with an axle, and tested this in a<br />

compression test machine. The clamps began to de<strong>for</strong>m at 7.4 t, and the<br />

brazed joint could be heard to crack at 8.2-t <strong>for</strong>ce and finally split open as<br />

shown in Figure 3.16 at 9.1-t <strong>for</strong>ce, with the break virtually identical to that<br />

of the accident bracket. There was no sign of any defect in the fracture surfaces<br />

of the bronze weld. The cracking followed the interface between the bronze<br />

and the steel.<br />

Suspecting that the discoloration of the fracture surfaces of the plaintiff’s<br />

bracket was postaccident and most probably resulted from exposure to moist<br />

atmospheres during the 8-month storage period between the accident and<br />

the expert’s examinations, part of this laboratory-produced fracture was<br />

masked off and the hub was left in an outdoor store. The exposed area of<br />

fracture quickly started to become discolored. This was because the fracture<br />

followed a brittle intermetallic layer <strong>for</strong>med at the interface of the bronze<br />

and the steel, which corrodes rapidly in moist air. The masked region was<br />

hardly affected after 2 weeks but 3 months after the masking was removed<br />

it was indistinguishable from the rest of the fracture interface. Hence, as<br />

neither expert had seen the hub fracture until several months after the accident<br />

and the machine had been stored in a farm barn <strong>for</strong> this period, there<br />

was no way of deducing what the fracture would have looked like immediately<br />

after the accident. The topography of the fracture displayed none of the<br />

characteristics of metal fatigue, so the defendant’s expert continued to believe<br />

it was an instantaneous fracture caused when the wheel hit the ground.<br />

The plaintiff’s expert had obtained a replacement clamp and put it<br />

through tensile tests to determine the <strong>for</strong>ce required to break the allegedly<br />

unsuitable bronze welded joints on the lug. Instead of the interface failing as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!