28.12.2012 Views

A “Toolbox” for Forensic Engineers

A “Toolbox” for Forensic Engineers

A “Toolbox” for Forensic Engineers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Accidents in the Workplace 275<br />

The sharp corner in the molding had initiated the crack and it represented<br />

a possible design defect if it had failed and caused the accident. Sharp internal<br />

corners are commonly present in many molded products, but are not necessarily<br />

defects unless it can be shown that these features cause product failure<br />

and hence accidents.<br />

8.4.2 Ladder Stability<br />

How was the ladder being used at the time of the accident? The key variables<br />

are the angle of repose of the ladder and the coefficient of friction between<br />

the feet and the ground. A visit to the site of the accident was essential, so<br />

the witness statement could be checked, and any further evidence that could<br />

clarify the circumstances could be examined directly. The visit showed visible<br />

evidence of the intermittent contact between the tips of the ladder and the<br />

wall below the window, and the traces of an impact with the small sill above<br />

the patio doors. The trace contact marks corroborated the witness statement,<br />

showing how the tips and hence the ladder structure itself had oscillated from<br />

side to side as it slipped down the wall. No traces of marks from the feet on<br />

the concrete slabs of the patio itself could be found. The angle of repose and<br />

coefficient of friction of the feet remained unknown, however. A reconstruction<br />

of events was essential to measure or calculate the data using the actual<br />

ladder itself.<br />

8.4.3 Reconstruction<br />

Although the injured user attempted to guess the in<strong>for</strong>mation requested<br />

(especially the angle of repose and degree of extension of the ladder), it is<br />

always best to measure independently. After traumatic injury, an individual<br />

is more likely to <strong>for</strong>get such in<strong>for</strong>mation, even if, in normal circumstances,<br />

they could recall such details. The ladder had not been photographed in situ<br />

just after the accident. There were no trace marks of the feet on the patio,<br />

from which the extended length of the ladder could be inferred. However,<br />

there were some key bits of in<strong>for</strong>mation that seemed indisputable: the tips<br />

of the ladder were resting on the sill, at about 16 ft (3.69 m) from the ground<br />

(as measured directly during the site visit).<br />

The events were reconstructed using the ladder fitted with new tips, and<br />

started by assuming the ladder was fully closed since this fitted the known<br />

facts. Another ladder owned by the investigator was placed by its side <strong>for</strong> the<br />

purposes of comparison and safety during stability tests. The aims of the test<br />

were as follows:<br />

1. To estimate the static coefficient of friction of the feet

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!