28.12.2012 Views

A “Toolbox” for Forensic Engineers

A “Toolbox” for Forensic Engineers

A “Toolbox” for Forensic Engineers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 <strong>Forensic</strong> Materials Engineering: Case Studies<br />

documents presented by each side in support of their case, and prepared by<br />

the lawyers with the aid of experts if technical issues are at stake. Frequently,<br />

so-called “skeleton arguments” can also be presented as more evidence comes<br />

to light as trial approaches, and the original pleadings must be revised.<br />

Expert engineers play a key role in marshalling the evidence, both real<br />

and often voluminous documentary evidence. Thus if a product fails, there<br />

will always be in-house documents from the manufacturer relating to quality<br />

control, <strong>for</strong> example. Such documents are usually “discovered” (a legal<br />

term <strong>for</strong> obtaining in<strong>for</strong>mation from the other side in a dispute) well be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

trial to all parties in an action, and may include, in technical cases, the<br />

following:<br />

• Maps, plans and engineering drawings<br />

• Quality control records<br />

• Testing records<br />

• Models and prototypes<br />

• Specifications and standards<br />

• Internal memos and correspondence between the parties (privileged<br />

documents being excluded)<br />

Such documents assume great importance as a trial approaches, because<br />

they help to flesh out the background as well as provide key details about<br />

the product in question. A plaintiff who has suffered individual loss or injury<br />

from a product failure does not have the in<strong>for</strong>mation about the way in which<br />

the product was made and its quality checks after manufacture. The plaintiff<br />

will often have an expert report on the failure, however, that will point to<br />

areas that should show how the defect could have arisen or was not detected<br />

by the quality managers of the manufacturing company. The expert per<strong>for</strong>ms<br />

a valuable role here, by specifying what discovery should be made in order<br />

to clarify the failure, following production of his or her report or reports<br />

concerning the failure.<br />

However, it is the material evidence that usually <strong>for</strong>ms the starting point<br />

<strong>for</strong> a <strong>for</strong>ensic investigation, and it is often that very evidence that provides a<br />

much more detailed picture of what actually happened in an accident, <strong>for</strong><br />

example. The evidence often gives vital clues as to how an accident was<br />

initiated, perhaps from traces of contact with other bodies, or from features<br />

that reveal the way in which the product was made originally. Analysis can<br />

also show whether or not the material of construction was appropriate to<br />

the function it per<strong>for</strong>med in service, or whether it was affected by processing<br />

during manufacture, or by its working environment. It is the role of the<br />

expert engineer to initiate such investigations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!