28.12.2012 Views

A “Toolbox” for Forensic Engineers

A “Toolbox” for Forensic Engineers

A “Toolbox” for Forensic Engineers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

112 <strong>Forensic</strong> Materials Engineering: Case Studies<br />

Figure 4.16 Microstructures of commercially pure (CP) titanium obtained by<br />

thermal treatment (magnification: 400¥).<br />

one surface is de<strong>for</strong>med into a convex shape and the material here is in<br />

tension, while the opposite surface is de<strong>for</strong>med into a concave shape where<br />

it is under compression. It is often thought that <strong>for</strong>ensic work, being scientific<br />

by nature, must always be accompanied by long mathematical arguments.<br />

However, this is not the case as simple logic matched against the evidence is<br />

the only way in which causation is determined. Nevertheless, there are occasions<br />

where quantitative evaluation becomes valuable. A simple equation<br />

used <strong>for</strong> evaluating stresses and strains on beams in bending is the “engineer’s<br />

bending equation”:<br />

M/I = s /y = E/R<br />

where M is the moment on the beam, I the second moment of area of the<br />

beam section, s the stress at a distance y across the beam section, E the tensile<br />

modulus of the beam material and R the radius of curvature of the bent<br />

beam (Figure 4.17). Some of these variables become constant when a single<br />

type of beam is considered under two different loading conditions. Thus E<br />

is constant (same material) and I is constant (same section shape).<br />

A particular case that required calculation of strain on the outside of a<br />

bend occurred when a manufacturer encountered a problem when <strong>for</strong>ming

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!