05.01.2013 Views

Semiotics for Beginners by Daniel Chandler

Semiotics for Beginners by Daniel Chandler

Semiotics for Beginners by Daniel Chandler

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Semiotics</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Beginners</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Daniel</strong> <strong>Chandler</strong><br />

Then there is the principle of surroundedness, according to which areas which can be seen as<br />

surrounded <strong>by</strong> others tend to be perceived as figures.<br />

Now we're in this frame of mind, interpreting the image shown above should not be too difficult. What<br />

tends to confuse observers initially is that they assume that the white area is the ground rather than<br />

the figure. If you couldn't be<strong>for</strong>e, you should now be able to discern the word 'TIE'.<br />

All of these principles of perceptual organization serve the overarching principle of pragnänz, which is<br />

that the simplest and most stable interpretations are favoured.<br />

What the Gestalt principles of perceptual organization suggest is that we may be predisposed<br />

towards interpreting ambiguous images in one way rather than another <strong>by</strong> universal principles. We<br />

may accept such a proposition at the same time as accepting that such predispositions may also be<br />

generated <strong>by</strong> other factors. Similarly, we may accept the Gestalt principles whilst at the same time<br />

regarding other aspects of perception as being learned and culturally variable rather than innate. The<br />

Gestalt principles can be seen as rein<strong>for</strong>cing the notion that the world is not simply and objectively<br />

'out there' but is constructed in the process of perception. As Bill Nichols comments, 'a useful habit<br />

<strong>for</strong>med <strong>by</strong> our brains must not be mistaken <strong>for</strong> an essential attribute of reality. Just as we must learn<br />

to read an image, we must learn to read the physical world. Once we have developed this skill (which<br />

we do very early in life), it is very easy to mistake it <strong>for</strong> an automatic or unlearned process, just as we<br />

may mistake our particular way of reading, or seeing, <strong>for</strong> a natural, ahistorical and noncultural given'<br />

(Nichols 1981, 12).<br />

We are rarely aware of our own habitual ways of seeing the world. It takes deliberate ef<strong>for</strong>t to become<br />

more aware of everyday visual perception as a code. Its habitual application obscures the traces of its<br />

intervention. However, a simple experiment allows us to 'bracket' visual perception at least briefly. For<br />

this to be possible, you need to sit facing the same direction without moving your body <strong>for</strong> a few<br />

minutes:<br />

Gaze blankly at the space in front of you. Avoid 'fixing' the space into objects and spaces<br />

between objects; instead, try to see it as a continuum of impressions. If the necessary degree<br />

of purposelessness is achieved, the space will lose its familiar properties. Instead of receding<br />

in depth, it will seem to float dimensionless from the bottom to the top of the field of vision. A<br />

rectangular book, instead of lying flat on a table, will be a<br />

trapezoidal patch of a certain colour and texture rising vertically<br />

in this flattened field. (Nichols 1981, 12).<br />

This process of bracketing perception will be more familiar to<br />

those who draw or paint who are used to converting three

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!