Semiotics for Beginners by Daniel Chandler
Semiotics for Beginners by Daniel Chandler
Semiotics for Beginners by Daniel Chandler
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Semiotics</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Beginners</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Daniel</strong> <strong>Chandler</strong><br />
distinctive interpretative repertoire of concepts, tropes and myths) <strong>for</strong> constructing and maintaining particular<br />
<strong>for</strong>ms of reality within the ontological domain (or topic) defined as relevant to its concerns. Representational<br />
codes thus reflect relational principles underlying the symbolic order of the 'discursive field'. According to<br />
Foucault, whose primary concern was the analysis of 'discursive <strong>for</strong>mations' in specific historical and sociocultural<br />
contexts, a particular discursive <strong>for</strong>mation maintains its own 'regime of truth'. He adopted a stance of<br />
linguistic determinism, arguing that the dominant tropes within the discourse of a particular historical period<br />
determine what can be known - constituting the basic episteme of the age. A range of discursive positions is<br />
available at any given time, reflecting many determinants (economic, political, sexual etc.). Foucault focused on<br />
power relations, noting that within such contexts, the discourses and signifiers of some interpretative communities<br />
(e.g. 'law', 'money', 'power') are privileged and dominant whilst others are marginalized. Structuralists<br />
deterministically see the subject as the product of the available discourses whilst constructivists allow <strong>for</strong> the<br />
possibility of negotiation or resistance. Poststructuralists deny any meaning (or more provocatively any reality)<br />
outside of discourses. See also: Episteme, Interpretative community, Interpretative repertoire, Representation,<br />
Representational codes, Signifying practices, Symbolic order<br />
• Discourse community: See Interpretative community<br />
• Discursive <strong>for</strong>mations: See Discourse<br />
• Discursive positioning: See Subject<br />
• Discursive practices: See Signifying practices<br />
• Displacement (Linguistic): This refers to the power of words to refer to things in their absence. Displacement was<br />
identified <strong>by</strong> Hockett as a key 'design feature' of language. It enables signs to be more than simply indexical and<br />
facilitates reflective thought and communication using texts which can be detached from their authors. See also:<br />
Design features of language<br />
• Displacement (Freud): This is a concept introduced <strong>by</strong> Freud <strong>for</strong> the psychoanalytical interpretation of dreams: in<br />
displacement unconscious desire is displaced into another symbol. See also: Condensation<br />
• Dominant (or 'hegemonic') code and reading: Within Stuart Hall's framework, this is an ideological code in which<br />
the decoder fully shares the text's code and accepts and reproduces the preferred reading (a reading which may<br />
not have been the result of any conscious intention on the part of the author(s)) - in such a stance the textual<br />
code seems 'natural' and 'transparent'. See also: Preferred reading, Ideological codes, Negotiated code and<br />
reading, Oppositional code and reading, Transparency<br />
• Double articulation: A semiotic code which has 'double articulation' (as in the case of verbal language) can be<br />
analysed into two abstract structural levels: a higher level called 'the level of first articulation' and a lower level -<br />
'the level of second articulation'. At the level of first articulation the system consists of the smallest meaningful<br />
units available (e.g. morphemes or words in a language). These meaningful units are complete signs, each<br />
consisting of a signifier and a signified. At the level of second articulation, a semiotic code is divisible into minimal<br />
functional units which lack meaning in themselves (e.g. phonemes in speech or graphemes in writing). They are<br />
not signs in themselves (the code must have a first level of articulation <strong>for</strong> these lower units to be combined into<br />
meaningful signs). Theoretical linguists have largely abandoned the use of the term articulation in the structural<br />
sense, preferring to refer to 'duality of patterning'. See also: Articulation, Design features of language, First<br />
articulation, Second articulation, Single articulation<br />
• Dualism: See Binarism<br />
• Duality of patterning: See Double articulation<br />
• Dyadic model of sign: A dyadic model of the sign is based on a division of the sign into two necessary constituent<br />
elements. Saussure's model of the sign is a dyadic model (note that Saussure insisted that such a division was<br />
purely analytical). See also: Models of the sign, Triadic model<br />
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z<br />
• Economism: See Reductionism<br />
• Economy, semiotic: See Semiotic economy<br />
• Elaborated codes: See Narrowcast codes<br />
• Élite interpreter: Semioticians who reject the investigation of other people's interpretations privilege what has been<br />
called the 'élite interpreter' - though socially-oriented semioticians would insist that the exploration of people's<br />
interpretative practices is fundamental to semiotics.