05.01.2013 Views

Semiotics for Beginners by Daniel Chandler

Semiotics for Beginners by Daniel Chandler

Semiotics for Beginners by Daniel Chandler

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Semiotics</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Beginners</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Daniel</strong> <strong>Chandler</strong><br />

to the dominant <strong>for</strong>m of framing used <strong>for</strong> paintings. Whilst sharing the single, central viewing point of<br />

painterly artificial perspective, photography involves the most remorseless application of this code.<br />

Photographs sometimes exhibit even more 'distortion' of phenomenal realism than paintings do:<br />

snapshots of tall buildings exhibit a disturbingly pronounced convergence of the vertical lines (we are<br />

less accustomed to vertical convergence because even Renaissance artists avoided it). In 35mm<br />

photography, the illusion of depth is most striking when 'normal' lenses of about 50mm are used: we<br />

become more aware of 'distortion' when a telephoto or wide-angle lens is used (Nichols 1981, 19).<br />

'Photorealism' has nevertheless become the standard <strong>by</strong> which 'realistic' representations in visual art<br />

are subjectively judged (Kress & van Leeuwen 1996, 163-164).<br />

Just as illusionism of Renaissance linear perspective per<strong>for</strong>med the ideological function of 'positioning<br />

the subject', so too did the photographic image. 'The installation of the viewer as subject depends<br />

upon reserving a singular place <strong>for</strong> him or her, the reciprocal in front of the image of the vanishing<br />

point "behind" it, the point of origin from which the camera "took" its view and where we now take<br />

ours' (Nichols 1981, 159). French theorists associated with the journals Tel Quel and Cinéthique<br />

argued that since the code of linear perspective is built into the camera, photography and film which,<br />

whilst appearing to involve simply a neutral recording of reality, serve to rein<strong>for</strong>ce 'a bourgeois<br />

ideology which makes the individual subject the focus and origin of meaning' (Stam 2000, 137). Film<br />

and television add a narrative dimension to the positioning of the subject, incorporating not only linear<br />

perspective but also dominant narrative devices specific to filmic media. Film theorists refer to the use<br />

of 'suture' (surgical stitching) - the 'invisible editing' of shot relationships which seeks to <strong>for</strong>eground<br />

the narrative and mask the ideological processes which shape the subjectivity of viewers. Some<br />

Lacanian theorists argue that in the context of conventional narrative (with its possibilities of<br />

identification and opposition), the unique character of the cinema (e.g. watching a large bright screen<br />

in the dark) offers us the seductive sense of a 'return' to the pre-linguistic 'mirror-phase' of the<br />

'Imaginary' in which the self was constructed (Nichols 1981, 300).<br />

'A sign... addresses somebody,' Charles Peirce declared (Peirce 1931-58, 2.228). Signs 'address' us<br />

within particular codes. A genre is a semiotic code within which we are 'positioned' as 'ideal readers'<br />

through the use of particular 'modes of address'. Modes of address can be defined as the ways in<br />

which relations between addresser and addressee are constructed in a text. In order to communicate,<br />

a producer of any text must make some assumptions about an intended audience; reflections of such<br />

assumptions may be discerned in the text (advertisements offer particularly clear examples of this).<br />

Rather than a specifically semiotic concept, 'the positioning of the subject' is a structuralist notion -<br />

although Stuart Hall notes its absence in early structuralist discourse (Hall 1996, 46); Saussure did<br />

not discuss it. It is a concept which has been widely adopted <strong>by</strong> semioticians and so it needs to be<br />

explored in this context. The term 'subject' needs some initial explanation. In 'theories of subjectivity'<br />

a distinction is made between 'the subject' and 'the individual'. As Fiske puts it, 'the individual is<br />

produced <strong>by</strong> nature; the subject <strong>by</strong> culture... The subject... is a social construction, not a natural one'<br />

(Fiske 1992, 288; my emphases). Whilst the individual is an actual person, the subject is a set of<br />

roles constructed <strong>by</strong> dominant cultural and ideological values (e.g. in terms of class, age, gender and<br />

ethnicity). Ideology turns individuals into subjects. Subjects are not actual people but exist only in<br />

relation to the interpretation of texts and are constructed through the use of signs. The<br />

psychoanalytical theorist Jacques Lacan undermined the humanist notion of a unified and consistent<br />

subject. The individual can occupy multiple subject positions, some of them contradictory. 'Identity'<br />

can be seen as 'a matrix of subject-positions' (Belsey 1980, 61). The fluidity and fragmentation of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!