05.01.2013 Views

Semiotics for Beginners by Daniel Chandler

Semiotics for Beginners by Daniel Chandler

Semiotics for Beginners by Daniel Chandler

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Semiotics</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Beginners</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Daniel</strong> <strong>Chandler</strong><br />

in such a way that their representations are taken to be reflections of everyday reality. Such<br />

structuralist framings of positioning reflect a stance of textual determinism which has been challenged<br />

<strong>by</strong> contemporary social semioticians who tend to emphasise the 'polysemic' nature of texts (their<br />

plurality of meanings) together with the diversity of their use and interpretation <strong>by</strong> different audiences<br />

('multiaccentuality'). However, a distinction may be appropriate here between message and code.<br />

Whilst resistance at the level of the message is always possible, resistance at the level of the code is<br />

generally much more difficult when the code is a dominant one. The familiarity of the codes in 'realist'<br />

texts (especially photographic and filmic texts) leads us to routinely 'suspend our disbelief' in the <strong>for</strong>m<br />

(even if not necessarily in the manifest content). Recognition of the familiar (in the guise of the<br />

'natural') repeatedly confirms our conventional ways of seeing and thus rein<strong>for</strong>ces our sense of self<br />

whilst at the same time invisibly contributing to its construction. 'When we say "I see (what the image<br />

means)" this act simultaneously installs us in a place of knowledge and slips us into place as subject<br />

to this meaning... All the viewer need do is fall into place as subject' (Nichols 1981, 38). Falling into<br />

place in a realist text is a pleasurable experience which few would wish to disrupt with reflective<br />

analysis (which would throw the security of our sense of self into question). Thus we freely submit to<br />

the ideological processes which construct our sense of ourselves as free-thinking individuals.<br />

A primary textual code involved in the construction of the subject is that of genre. Genres are<br />

ostensibly 'neutral', functioning to make <strong>for</strong>m (the conventions of the genre) more 'transparent' to<br />

those familiar with the genre, <strong>for</strong>egrounding the distinctive content of individual texts. Certainly genre<br />

provides an important frame of reference which helps readers to identify, select and interpret texts (as<br />

well as helping writers to compose economically within the medium). However, a genre can also be<br />

seen as embodying certain values and ideological assumptions and as seeking to establish a<br />

particular worldview. Changes in genre conventions may both reflect and help to shape the dominant<br />

ideological climate of the time. Some Marxist commentators see genre as an instrument of social<br />

control which reproduces the dominant ideology. Within this perspective, the genre is seen as<br />

positioning the audience in order to naturalize the reassuringly conservative ideologies which are<br />

typically embedded in the text. Certainly, genres are far from being ideologically neutral. Different<br />

genres produce different positionings of the subject which are reflected in their modes of address.<br />

Tony Thwaites and his colleagues note that in many television crime dramas in the tradition of The<br />

Saint, Hart to Hart, and Murder, She Wrote,<br />

Genteel or well-to-do private investigators work <strong>for</strong> the wealthy, solving crimes committed <strong>by</strong><br />

characters whose social traits and behaviour patterns often type them as members of a<br />

'criminal class'... The villains receive their just rewards not so much because they break the<br />

law, but because they are entirely distinct from the law-abiding bourgeoisie. This TV genre<br />

thus reproduces a hegemonic ideology about the individual in a class society. (Thwaites et al.<br />

1994, 158).<br />

Thus, over and above the specific 'content' of the individual text, generic frameworks can be seen as<br />

involved in the construction of their readers.<br />

Saussure emphasized that the language system is a 'given' which precedes its users and is beyond<br />

human control. Developing this stance, post-Saussurean structuralist theorists have argued that<br />

contrary to the notion that semiotic systems are instrumental tools which are fully subject to the<br />

control of 'the individual', the subject is constructed <strong>by</strong> the semiotic system of language, ideology, and<br />

myth. Such structural determinism and autonomy is reflected, <strong>for</strong> instance, in Lévi-Strauss's

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!