09.01.2013 Views

Faculty of Humanities and Education (Postgraduate) - The University ...

Faculty of Humanities and Education (Postgraduate) - The University ...

Faculty of Humanities and Education (Postgraduate) - The University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

POSTGRADUATE REGULATIONS & SYLLABUSES 2012 - 2013<br />

THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES & EDUCATION<br />

Year 2<br />

Semester 1<br />

Course Code Course Title Credits<br />

EDSC 6004 Information <strong>and</strong> Communication<br />

Technologies in the Science Classroom 4<br />

EDSC 6005 Leadership in Science <strong>Education</strong> 4<br />

EDRS 6900 Research Project 10<br />

EDRS 6203 Graduate Research Seminars Pass/Fail<br />

Semester 2<br />

Course Code Course Title Credits<br />

EDRS 6900 Research Project 10<br />

EDRS 6203 Graduate Research Seminars Pass/Fail<br />

COURSE OUTLINES<br />

YEAR: 1<br />

SEMESTER: 1<br />

COURSE CODE: EDSC 6000<br />

COURSE TITLE: SCIENCE AND SCIENCE EDUCATION: NATURE,<br />

HISTORY, NEXUS<br />

NUMBER OF CREDITS : 4<br />

COURSE DESCRIPTION:<br />

Rationale<br />

Beliefs about the nature <strong>of</strong> science - what science is <strong>and</strong> how it<br />

works-underpincurriculumdocuments,textbooks,<strong>and</strong>teachers’<br />

efforts at implementing the science curriculum in the classroom.<br />

However, since the emergence <strong>of</strong> science as a discipline in the 17 th<br />

century, there have been disputes about what counts as science.<br />

This course is designed to <strong>of</strong>fer participants an exploration <strong>of</strong><br />

the ideas about the nature <strong>of</strong> science <strong>and</strong> its philosophical <strong>and</strong><br />

epistemological underpinnings within an historical context. <strong>The</strong><br />

aim is to provide participants with the conceptual framework<br />

necessary to underst<strong>and</strong> the discipline <strong>of</strong> science better <strong>and</strong> to<br />

be able to interrogate school science curricula, documents <strong>and</strong><br />

textbooks, <strong>and</strong> their own science education pedagogy.<br />

OBJECTIVES<br />

At the end <strong>of</strong> the course participants will be able to:<br />

• discuss the philosophical theories underpinning ideas<br />

about the nature <strong>of</strong> science <strong>and</strong> scientific knowledge<br />

• distinguish among selected philosophies <strong>of</strong> science<br />

• identify philosophical underpinnings <strong>of</strong> selected school<br />

science curricula, documents, <strong>and</strong> textbooks<br />

• assess the implications <strong>of</strong> selected philosophies <strong>of</strong> science<br />

for classroom practice<br />

• discuss the relationship between science teachers’ beliefs<br />

about the nature <strong>of</strong> science <strong>and</strong> their pedagogy<br />

• design <strong>and</strong> evaluate strategies for the inclusion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

study <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> science in school science curricula<br />

CONTENT<br />

• Science wars: Great feuds in science<br />

• Constructivism, logical positivism, relativism, na•ve<br />

empiricism<br />

• <strong>The</strong> work <strong>of</strong> Kuhn, Popper, Feyerabend, Lakatos<br />

• Postmodern <strong>and</strong> feminist views on the nature <strong>of</strong> science<br />

• History <strong>of</strong> science as a discipline in western civilisation<br />

• History <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> science curricula from the UK <strong>and</strong><br />

the USA on science curricula in the Caribbean<br />

• Science teachers’ beliefs about the nature <strong>of</strong> science<br />

• Science <strong>and</strong> pseudoscience<br />

• Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> curriculum design<br />

MAJOR COMPETENCIES TO BE DEVELOPED<br />

• Reflection<br />

• Critical thinking<br />

• Enhanced curriculum development skills<br />

ASSESSMENT<br />

• Examination (3 hours) 60%<br />

• Coursework 40%<br />

• Development <strong>of</strong> a module that addresses the nature<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or history <strong>of</strong> science<br />

• Analysis <strong>of</strong> selected science curricula/documents/<br />

textbooks to determine the nature <strong>of</strong> science<br />

embedded<br />

REQUIRED READING<br />

McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (2000). <strong>The</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> science in science<br />

education: Rationales <strong>and</strong> strategies. Dordrecht, <strong>The</strong><br />

Netherl<strong>and</strong>s: Kluwer.<br />

Monk, M., & Dillon, J. (2000). <strong>The</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> scientific knowledge.<br />

In M. Monk & J. Osborne (Eds.),<br />

Good practice in science teaching: What research has to say (pp.<br />

72-87). Buckingham: Open <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />

RECOMMENDED READING<br />

Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

science <strong>and</strong> their relationship to classroom practice. Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Teacher <strong>Education</strong>, 41(3), 53-62.<br />

Calabrese-Barton, A. (1998). Feminist science education. New<br />

York: Teachers College Press.<br />

Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2004). <strong>The</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> science: Always<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the science story. <strong>The</strong> Science Teacher, 71(9), 28-31.<br />

Donnelly, J. (1979). <strong>The</strong> work <strong>of</strong> Popper <strong>and</strong> Kuhn on the nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> science. School Science Review, 60(212), 489-500.<br />

Farrell, R. P. (2000). Will the Popperian Feyerabend please step<br />

forward: Pluralistic, Popperian themes in the philosophy <strong>of</strong><br />

Paul Feyerabend. International Studies in the Philosophy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Science, 14(3), 257-266.<br />

Fox-Keller, E., & Longino, H. E. (Eds.). (1996). Feminism <strong>and</strong> science.<br />

Oxford: Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />

Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms,<br />

feminisms, <strong>and</strong> epistemologies. Indiana: IUP.<br />

Matthews, M. R. (1992). Old wine in new bottles: A problem<br />

with constructivist epistemology. In H. A. Alex<strong>and</strong>er<br />

(Ed.), Philosophy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> (pp 303-311). Urbana, Ill:<br />

Philosophy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Society.<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!