Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2011 Algae Platform Review – <strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong> are direct transcripts of commentary and material provided by the Platform’s<br />
Review Panel. They have not been edited or altered by the Biomass Program.<br />
ii. Feedstock Supply R&D (ex. biology, cultivation, resource use, biomass characteristics,<br />
harvesting/dewatering)<br />
iii. Downstream Refining R&D (ex. extraction, conversion, fuel, products, fuel/product infrastructure and<br />
end-use)<br />
iv. Environmental sustainability (example: water use, GMOs, energy consumption)<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 1 Criteria Score: 4<br />
Critical success factors were not enumerated. It sounded like investigators were looking for them. I think<br />
they have not evaluated what are the real key deliverables, and what it would take to achieve them.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 2 Criteria Score: 7<br />
Procedures need to be refined to produce "clean" lipids.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 3 Criteria Score: 7<br />
Success factors: Low severity processing has opportunity to provide low cost pathway for extraction of<br />
high value fuels precursors Challenges: separations and gas cleaning<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 4 Criteria Score: 6<br />
See Overall Impression text.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 5 Criteria Score: 4<br />
Among the critical success factors is "cost effective methods for production of fuel precursors."<br />
Overcoming this obstacle seems unlikely (even at the outset) using these technologies.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 6 Criteria Score: 4<br />
From a scale up perspective, this approach is extremely challenged from an energy balance or process<br />
control point of view.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 7 Criteria Score: 3<br />
A critical success factor is techno economic screencing of process concepts prior to initiation of lab work.<br />
This was not evident in the presentation.<br />
Presenter Response<br />
A criticism was leveled concerning the economic viability of using microwaves. We agree that if<br />
microwaves are used simply to heat the water in the algae/water slurry that this is an inefficient and<br />
(likely) uneconomical prospect. The reviewers failed to grasp that our hypothesis is that microwaves can<br />
be used selectively to effect cell wall rupture by hydrothermal degradation, thus liberating lipids which<br />
will spontaneously separate from the water phase and spent algal bodies (solids). Further, we have found<br />
that the aqueous phase contains most of the protein material from the cell walls. Thus, the microwaveassisted<br />
process is a way of effecting simultaneous extraction and separation of lipid materials from algae<br />
- this is the hypothesis being tested. This is being accomplished at very low severity conditions compared<br />
to other hydrothermal processes which operate at pressures of about 150 atm and temperatures around<br />
350°C. Our work on pyrolysis is similarly providing evidence that fuels precursors can be effectively<br />
liberated from algae under low severity conditions. Gasification was found to produce a syngas with high<br />
tar loadings, so this pathway has been de-emphasized in the research program.<br />
Page 120 of 223