Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2011 Algae Platform Review – <strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong> are direct transcripts of commentary and material provided by the Platform’s<br />
Review Panel. They have not been edited or altered by the Biomass Program.<br />
might require more funding and sub-groups that were not evident in presentation.<br />
PO4-3 is indeed important, but is only one piece of the puzzle. The presentation flashed a slide of other<br />
projects that are included in the contract, but they were not explained.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 3 Criteria Score: 7<br />
In consultation with Commercial Partners, CAB-Comm will: Identify the most pressing research needs<br />
and assign a priority status: Identify the research group(s) with the capabilities and expertise to address<br />
each priority item: Identify milestones and deliverables for specific projects<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 5 Criteria Score: 5<br />
Not possible to adequately score this item because of inadequate detail in presentation. There were no<br />
detailed descriptions in the presentation about the role of each laboratory. In final slides, 5-6 general<br />
objectives were listed for each of the three goals.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 6 Criteria Score: 5<br />
See Overall Impressions<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 7 Criteria Score: 4<br />
Milestones and deliverables were not defined. Targets of research are broad and vague.<br />
Presenter Response<br />
2. Technical Progress and Accomplishments<br />
Please evaluate the degree to which the project has made progress in its objectives and stated project<br />
management plan has met its objectives in achieving milestones and overcoming technical barriers.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 1 Criteria Score: 5<br />
No actual progress expected because of the very recent actual award. At least plans are being formulated.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 2 Criteria Score: 5<br />
Just started.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 3 Criteria Score: 7<br />
Too early to tell, project just started (last week).<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 5 Criteria Score: 6<br />
No progress to date--funding just begun.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 6 Criteria Score: 5<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 7 Criteria Score: 4<br />
Since this is a new project, the expected progress is to have defined objectives and a management plan.<br />
These were not presented.<br />
Page 34 of 223