17.01.2013 Views

Reviewer Comments - EERE

Reviewer Comments - EERE

Reviewer Comments - EERE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2011 Algae Platform Review – <strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong> are direct transcripts of commentary and material provided by the Platform’s<br />

Review Panel. They have not been edited or altered by the Biomass Program.<br />

might require more funding and sub-groups that were not evident in presentation.<br />

PO4-3 is indeed important, but is only one piece of the puzzle. The presentation flashed a slide of other<br />

projects that are included in the contract, but they were not explained.<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 3 Criteria Score: 7<br />

In consultation with Commercial Partners, CAB-Comm will: Identify the most pressing research needs<br />

and assign a priority status: Identify the research group(s) with the capabilities and expertise to address<br />

each priority item: Identify milestones and deliverables for specific projects<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 5 Criteria Score: 5<br />

Not possible to adequately score this item because of inadequate detail in presentation. There were no<br />

detailed descriptions in the presentation about the role of each laboratory. In final slides, 5-6 general<br />

objectives were listed for each of the three goals.<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 6 Criteria Score: 5<br />

See Overall Impressions<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 7 Criteria Score: 4<br />

Milestones and deliverables were not defined. Targets of research are broad and vague.<br />

Presenter Response<br />

2. Technical Progress and Accomplishments<br />

Please evaluate the degree to which the project has made progress in its objectives and stated project<br />

management plan has met its objectives in achieving milestones and overcoming technical barriers.<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 1 Criteria Score: 5<br />

No actual progress expected because of the very recent actual award. At least plans are being formulated.<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 2 Criteria Score: 5<br />

Just started.<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 3 Criteria Score: 7<br />

Too early to tell, project just started (last week).<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 5 Criteria Score: 6<br />

No progress to date--funding just begun.<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 6 Criteria Score: 5<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 7 Criteria Score: 4<br />

Since this is a new project, the expected progress is to have defined objectives and a management plan.<br />

These were not presented.<br />

Page 34 of 223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!