17.01.2013 Views

Reviewer Comments - EERE

Reviewer Comments - EERE

Reviewer Comments - EERE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2011 Algae Platform Review – <strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong> are direct transcripts of commentary and material provided by the Platform’s<br />

Review Panel. They have not been edited or altered by the Biomass Program.<br />

insights subsequently to other green algal species. We see the potential of transformational discoveries<br />

that allows to overcome the long known principle limitation, that algae typically produce high amounts of<br />

lipid exclusively under nutrient stress.<br />

R6: The reviewer expresses here his negative view on the value of using model organisms. Also a<br />

negative view on Metabolic Flux Analysis (MFA), a method usually applied under well controlled<br />

laboratory conditions.<br />

Our proposal has a focus on the role of carbon partitioning, i.e. central metabolism in oil accumulation.<br />

Please note that in the <strong>EERE</strong> algal biofuels roadmap the goal to understand carbon partitioning was<br />

emphasized in a paragraph on p. 11.<br />

We disagree with the view that knowledge gained by MFA with the model species Chlamydomonas is<br />

irrelevant for commercial production in ponds. Calvin and coworkers dissected the reaction scheme of<br />

carbon fixation in photosynthesis using green algae under strictly controlled laboratory conditions. Their<br />

findings are the foundation to understand photosynthesis and biomass production in general as well as for<br />

green alga in ponds. In addition to the classical Calvin cycle, some years ago the presenting PI could<br />

describe an important novel functional mode in carbon fixation and oil synthesis (Schwender et al.,<br />

Nature 432: 779–782, 2004). This work was done by the use of MFA and underscores the value of this<br />

approach for improvement of oil production.<br />

Please see citations under “1 Approach”.<br />

Project: 9.1.3.2 INL<br />

Title: Microalgae Harvesting/Dewatering and Drying<br />

Presenter: Deborah Newby<br />

Presentation Date: Friday, April 08, 2011<br />

Criteria Avg Score Std Deviation Count<br />

Approach 4.29 0.70 7<br />

Progress 5.00 0.76 7<br />

Relevance 5.00 1.31 7<br />

Critical Success Factors 4.29 1.67 7<br />

1. Project Approach<br />

The project performers have implemented technically sound research, development, and deployment<br />

approaches and demonstrated necessary results to meet their targets<br />

The project performers have identified a project management plan that includes well-defined milestones<br />

and adequate methods for addressing potential risks.<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 1 Criteria Score: 4<br />

The program approach is reasonable with one big question mark. Did anyone perform a simple energy<br />

and cost analysis for this particular filtration technology? The technology must have a chance of<br />

competing with other technologies. The presentation left me with the perception that the technique was<br />

chosen for other reasons, and no simple assessment was done.<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 2 Criteria Score: 4<br />

The project aims to lower the cost of harvesting and collecting algae and to recycle the water used by<br />

biomass facilities with new/improved processes. Several problems are apparent, but the project only<br />

began in October 2010, so there is opportunity to improve the project. One problem is that the filter<br />

Page 135 of 223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!