17.01.2013 Views

Reviewer Comments - EERE

Reviewer Comments - EERE

Reviewer Comments - EERE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2011 Algae Platform Review – <strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong> are direct transcripts of commentary and material provided by the Platform’s<br />

Review Panel. They have not been edited or altered by the Biomass Program.<br />

of deoxygenation. Converting unpurified carboxylate salts does result in a much greater variety of organic<br />

compounds, but these may not be problematic if the mixture is ultimately hydrotreated and blended with<br />

petroleum-based fuels. Thus, the fermentation media is disposed of by evaporating out the water and the<br />

solids are sent to ketonization. The ash from the ketonization contains CaCO3 and other alkaline<br />

components which would be recycled back to neutralize the fermentation step. The ash recycle would<br />

eventually require purging and it may have value as an alkaline soil amendment ( this is currently how the<br />

algae sludges are disposed of—as alkaline soil conditioner) A study of comparing methanogenic and<br />

acidogenic digestion of biomass is underway. Preliminary findings (not a part of this project) appear to<br />

suggest that the higher value of liquid fuels and chemicals can more than offset the greater complexity of<br />

the processing. However, AD does benefit from much easier scale down to process small volume<br />

resources, with the small-scale resources investigated in this study, this is likely to be true. We are<br />

finding, though, that at these smaller scales, the costs appear attractive compared to other liquid biofuel<br />

technologies.<br />

Project: 9.2.1.1 Montana State University<br />

Title: Extremophilic Microalgae: Advanced Lipid and Biomass Production for Biofuels and<br />

Bioproducts<br />

Presenter: Brent Peyton<br />

Presentation Date: Thursday, April 07, 2011<br />

Criteria Avg Score Std Deviation Count<br />

Approach 6.00 1.07 7<br />

Progress 5.86 1.12 7<br />

Relevance 5.71 1.28 7<br />

Critical Success Factors 5.57 1.40 7<br />

1. Project Approach<br />

The project performers have implemented technically sound research, development, and deployment<br />

approaches and demonstrated necessary results to meet their targets<br />

The project performers have identified a project management plan that includes well-defined milestones<br />

and adequate methods for addressing potential risks.<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 1 Criteria Score: 7<br />

The project has proceeded in a logical fashion and has therefore had a reasonable approach. The next<br />

stage is to scale-up out of the lab, and this is what is planned.<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 2 Criteria Score: 6<br />

A major focus of this project is to screen algae that may be good lipid producers for growth at high pH,<br />

where they may be protected from competition and predators.<br />

<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 3 Criteria Score: 7<br />

Effort focuses on characterizing and quantifying alkaliphilic algal growth and lipid production for scaleup<br />

to open ponds. Issues to be addressed: -Help stabilize algal pond systems without genetic modification,<br />

-Increase CO2 uptake rates -Utilize low quality water -Provide TAG production rate and extent data in<br />

outdoor systems<br />

Page 77 of 223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!