Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2011 Algae Platform Review – <strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong> are direct transcripts of commentary and material provided by the Platform’s<br />
Review Panel. They have not been edited or altered by the Biomass Program.<br />
of deoxygenation. Converting unpurified carboxylate salts does result in a much greater variety of organic<br />
compounds, but these may not be problematic if the mixture is ultimately hydrotreated and blended with<br />
petroleum-based fuels. Thus, the fermentation media is disposed of by evaporating out the water and the<br />
solids are sent to ketonization. The ash from the ketonization contains CaCO3 and other alkaline<br />
components which would be recycled back to neutralize the fermentation step. The ash recycle would<br />
eventually require purging and it may have value as an alkaline soil amendment ( this is currently how the<br />
algae sludges are disposed of—as alkaline soil conditioner) A study of comparing methanogenic and<br />
acidogenic digestion of biomass is underway. Preliminary findings (not a part of this project) appear to<br />
suggest that the higher value of liquid fuels and chemicals can more than offset the greater complexity of<br />
the processing. However, AD does benefit from much easier scale down to process small volume<br />
resources, with the small-scale resources investigated in this study, this is likely to be true. We are<br />
finding, though, that at these smaller scales, the costs appear attractive compared to other liquid biofuel<br />
technologies.<br />
Project: 9.2.1.1 Montana State University<br />
Title: Extremophilic Microalgae: Advanced Lipid and Biomass Production for Biofuels and<br />
Bioproducts<br />
Presenter: Brent Peyton<br />
Presentation Date: Thursday, April 07, 2011<br />
Criteria Avg Score Std Deviation Count<br />
Approach 6.00 1.07 7<br />
Progress 5.86 1.12 7<br />
Relevance 5.71 1.28 7<br />
Critical Success Factors 5.57 1.40 7<br />
1. Project Approach<br />
The project performers have implemented technically sound research, development, and deployment<br />
approaches and demonstrated necessary results to meet their targets<br />
The project performers have identified a project management plan that includes well-defined milestones<br />
and adequate methods for addressing potential risks.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 1 Criteria Score: 7<br />
The project has proceeded in a logical fashion and has therefore had a reasonable approach. The next<br />
stage is to scale-up out of the lab, and this is what is planned.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 2 Criteria Score: 6<br />
A major focus of this project is to screen algae that may be good lipid producers for growth at high pH,<br />
where they may be protected from competition and predators.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 3 Criteria Score: 7<br />
Effort focuses on characterizing and quantifying alkaliphilic algal growth and lipid production for scaleup<br />
to open ponds. Issues to be addressed: -Help stabilize algal pond systems without genetic modification,<br />
-Increase CO2 uptake rates -Utilize low quality water -Provide TAG production rate and extent data in<br />
outdoor systems<br />
Page 77 of 223