Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2011 Algae Platform Review – <strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong> are direct transcripts of commentary and material provided by the Platform’s<br />
Review Panel. They have not been edited or altered by the Biomass Program.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 6 Criteria Score: 2<br />
In addition to developing state of the art photobioreactors, the PI's suggest to tether cells to cellulose<br />
membranes. As a laboratory excercise on a nano-scale, this is most interesting, but unrealistic commercial<br />
scale production. In addition to the costs of cooling and materials, biofilms will coat the internal walls of<br />
any photobioreactor. Such films will restrict photon transfer and undermine the need to tether the cells. A<br />
simpler approach would be to innoculate with metaoblically manipulated cells that secrete oil and allow<br />
them to coat the inner walls. Still, cooling costs will likely challenge this approach. There is also the issue<br />
of CO2 delivery to tethered cells within a commercial scale photobioreactor system.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 7 Criteria Score: 3<br />
Well-defined criteria for success and milestone decision points were not presented. It did not appear that<br />
the scope was defiend by a preliminary evaluation of commercial viability.<br />
Presenter Response<br />
xx<br />
2. Technical Progress and Accomplishments<br />
Please evaluate the degree to which the project has made progress in its objectives and stated project<br />
management plan has met its objectives in achieving milestones and overcoming technical barriers.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 1 Criteria Score: 4<br />
On the basis of the results in the presentation, I believe more progress on the key thrusts could be made if<br />
less attention was given to nanobodies, etc.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 2 Criteria Score: 3<br />
This project is 50% complete. Membrane development and antibody stages of processing development<br />
appear expensive and their effectiveness for scale-up, especially with algae growing under commercial<br />
conditions needs to be demonstrated more rigorously.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 3 Criteria Score: 7<br />
Not a whole lot of progress yet. However, the effort aims to address: 1. High resolution lipidomics<br />
analysis capacity developed, 2. Transcriptomic analysis of N deprivation underway, 3. Development of<br />
novel molecular tools for genetic manipulation of algae, 4. Advancement of molecular algae viral<br />
pathogenesis, 5. Development of nanobody tools for algae growth, harvesting and research.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 4 Criteria Score: 2<br />
See Overall Impressions text.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 5 Criteria Score: 4<br />
The project appears to have met some of its objectives (development of molecular tools, etc).<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 6 Criteria Score: 4<br />
A fair amount of data was presented.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 7 Criteria Score: 3<br />
Data compared against a well defiend criteria to measure progress were not presented.<br />
Page 39 of 223