Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2011 Algae Platform Review – <strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong> are direct transcripts of commentary and material provided by the Platform’s<br />
Review Panel. They have not been edited or altered by the Biomass Program.<br />
transesterification. The team at UNL concurs with these well founded reviews and recognizes the critical<br />
importance of basic research on lipid production in algae, the development of molecular tools for<br />
engineering algae, and the importance of low cost innovative system of growth systems utilizing highly<br />
innovative and patent pending tools such as nanobodies in order to allow algae biofuels to be a reality.<br />
We indeed accept that the substantial innovative approaches marrying world class basic algae biology<br />
research and transformative application of novel tools to growth and harvesting (nanobodies) that the<br />
UNL team is pursuing are critical to truly economical biofuels production from algae. As stated in the<br />
review oral presentation, the presenter is clearly aware of the limitations of open raceway systems with<br />
aerial productivity limited to 25 gm/m2/day which has remained constant over 40 years. The presenter<br />
indeed is aware of the severe constraints of photobioreactor designs (PBRs) as currently configured as so<br />
acridly depicted by the reviewers. The presenter is aware of the heat removal need in PBRs and correctly<br />
presented a number of means of such heat removal. The UNL team is in fact developing innovative low<br />
cost growth systems to address the limitations of current PBRs including the use of nanobodies. The<br />
transformative value of these breakthrough technologies will be apparent as the result of this well placed<br />
DOE sponsored research. Unfortunately these tangible advances were evaluated on the basis of limited<br />
information (a 22 slide PowerPoint) and through the lens current and limited raceway technology. The<br />
UNL team does hold the Benneman point of view in high regard, that maintains with current technology<br />
algae biofuels are economically unattainable. The UNL team also strongly believes in the ability of the<br />
combination of basic research and transformative technologies such as nanobodies to overcome these<br />
obstacles. The UNL team is grateful for the opportunity afforded by the DOE to play a role in this<br />
transformation of algae biofuels to become a major element in the DOE biofuels portfolio and regrets the<br />
focus of the review team on current technologies with all their limitations.<br />
Project: 9.6.5.3 NREL<br />
Title: Algal Biofuel Pathway Baseline Costs<br />
Presenter: Andy Aden<br />
Presentation Date: Thursday, April 07, 2011<br />
Criteria Avg Score Std Deviation Count<br />
Approach 8.14 0.64 7<br />
Progress 8.00 0.53 7<br />
Relevance 8.43 1.05 7<br />
Critical Success Factors 7.29 1.03 7<br />
1. Project Approach<br />
The project performers have implemented technically sound research, development, and deployment<br />
approaches and demonstrated necessary results to meet their targets<br />
The project performers have identified a project management plan that includes well-defined milestones<br />
and adequate methods for addressing potential risks.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 1 Criteria Score: 8<br />
This is a project that is producing useful results right from the start. The needs and deliverables were<br />
thought out first, and the approaches are devised to achieve them.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 2 Criteria Score: 9<br />
Models are being developed well for evaluation of capability of sustainable production with most key<br />
Page 44 of 223