Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2011 Algae Platform Review – <strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong> are direct transcripts of commentary and material provided by the Platform’s<br />
Review Panel. They have not been edited or altered by the Biomass Program.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 4 Criteria Score: 5<br />
See Overall Impressions text.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 5 Criteria Score: 7<br />
The broad objectives are to develop and use high lipid producing alkaliphilic (sp?) strains from culture<br />
collections, determine kinetic parameters in lab-scale studies, and then test strains in open ponds at pilot<br />
scale at Utah State Univ. The science is sound and objectives are reasonable.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 6 Criteria Score: 6<br />
It is relevant to approach production in extrememe environments for all the reasons stated. And the use of<br />
high pH water is reasonable but the presentation lacked a clear demonstration of just how much of this<br />
kind of water there is. What is the resource and what is the rational amount of fuel that can be produced?<br />
Where are these waters located (i.e., in cold climates open culture or photobioreactors are severely<br />
challenged).<br />
I think overall this is an interesting project, extreme environments for high pH water) that will be stressed<br />
in terms of resource allocation and commercial application.<br />
The PI should do more than just propose extreme pH. The defense of this approach, from a resource<br />
management and commercial application point of view needs to be defended.<br />
Also, present biomass data as gdw l-1.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 7 Criteria Score: 4<br />
The project needs specifc goals for productivity and yield based on commercial algal biofuel production<br />
requirements.<br />
Presenter Response<br />
There is a significant amount of non-potable high pH and salinity water in the west, where potable water<br />
is extremely limited. Other, funded specific projects are focused on determining the water resources<br />
available across the country to determine where our work will be feasible.<br />
2. Technical Progress and Accomplishments<br />
Please evaluate the degree to which the project has made progress in its objectives and stated project<br />
management plan has met its objectives in achieving milestones and overcoming technical barriers.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 1 Criteria Score: 7<br />
Progress has been good through the several years of work. Still, the large scale-up effort remains.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 2 Criteria Score: 6<br />
The project is 65% complete and is now concentrating on characterization of 4 green algae and 4 diatoms<br />
but has found 30 strains that will grow at pH greater than 9.5 despite not being able to use carbonate as a<br />
C source (at least the main targets do not).<br />
Lipid production from these is high, based on Nile red; some analytical chemistry should be used to<br />
support the Nile red results.<br />
Page 78 of 223