Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2011 Algae Platform Review – <strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong> are direct transcripts of commentary and material provided by the Platform’s<br />
Review Panel. They have not been edited or altered by the Biomass Program.<br />
4. Critical Success Factors<br />
Please evaluate the degree to which:<br />
The project has identified critical factors, (including technical, business, market, regulatory, and legal<br />
factors) that impact the potential technical and commercial success of the project<br />
The project has presented adequate plans to recognize, address, and overcome these factors<br />
The project has the opportunity to advance the state of technology and impact the viability of commercial<br />
algal biomass feedstock supply and conversion, through one or more of the following:<br />
i. Cross-Cutting Analysis (ex. economic analysis, sustainability analysis, resource assessments, risk<br />
assessments)<br />
ii. Feedstock Supply R&D (ex. biology, cultivation, resource use, biomass characteristics,<br />
harvesting/dewatering)<br />
iii. Downstream Refining R&D (ex. extraction, conversion, fuel, products, fuel/product infrastructure and<br />
end-use)<br />
iv. Environmental sustainability (example: water use, GMOs, energy consumption)<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 1 Criteria Score: 6<br />
These CSFs have been stated in the presentation. They also are tied to each thrust.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 2 Criteria Score: 6<br />
Genomics' concentration must be demonstrated to be worthwhile at intensity developed.<br />
Disease/competitor problems must be overcome; stochastic events that cause crashes must be modelled<br />
realistically and costed.<br />
Probiotic bacterial angle likely to be significant.<br />
The most important thing now is to show cost-effective production of algal lipids to methane to<br />
bioproducts. Scale concerns must be met.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 3 Criteria Score: 8<br />
The project has systematically identified all possible factors and barriers that need be addressed for a<br />
successful outcome.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 4 Criteria Score: 4<br />
See Overall Impression text.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 5 Criteria Score: 5<br />
Unfortunately, there was not enough detail for evaluation.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 6 Criteria Score: 5<br />
Please evaluate the degree to which: The project has identified critical factors, (including technical,<br />
business, market, regulatory, and legal factors) that impact the potential technical and commercial success<br />
of the project Other than slide 2, not much in this area. The project has presented adequate plans to<br />
recognize, address, and overcome these factors. This was a weakness to the presentation as little<br />
discussion or mechanism by which this would be approached was presented. The project has the<br />
opportunity to advance the state of technology and impact the viability of commercial algal biomass<br />
feedstock supply and conversion, through one or more of the following: i. Cross-Cutting Analysis (ex.<br />
economic analysis, sustainability analysis, resource assessments, risk assessments)<br />
ii. Feedstock Supply R&D (ex. biology, cultivation, resource use, biomass characteristics,<br />
harvesting/dewatering)<br />
iii. Downstream Refining R&D (ex. extraction, conversion, fuel, products, fuel/product infrastructure and<br />
Page 14 of 223