Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
Reviewer Comments - EERE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2011 Algae Platform Review – <strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong> are direct transcripts of commentary and material provided by the Platform’s<br />
Review Panel. They have not been edited or altered by the Biomass Program.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 4 Criteria Score: 3<br />
See Overall Impression text.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 5 Criteria Score: 4<br />
It was very unclear how these results are relevant to program platform.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 6 Criteria Score: 5<br />
Although a very good project, given the objectives, these objectives are not focussed on large scale fuel<br />
production. The project does address a solid waste stream that needs to be managed, and how to do it with<br />
postiive energy economics. Microalgae a way to treat waste water is very useful.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 7 Criteria Score: 3<br />
There appear to be many issues with PLE that make the nutrient source problematic for algal biofuel<br />
production: color, odor, reduction of productivity.<br />
The economics and application at scale of immoblized nitrogen fixation should be presented.<br />
4. Critical Success Factors<br />
The project has identified critical factors, (including technical, business, market, regulatory, and legal<br />
factors) that impact the potential technical and commercial success of the project<br />
The project has presented adequate plans to recognize, address, and overcome these factors<br />
The project has the opportunity to advance the state of technology and impact the viability of commercial<br />
algal biomass feedstock supply and conversion, through one or more of the following:<br />
i. Cross-Cutting Analysis (ex. economic analysis, sustainability analysis, resource assessments, risk<br />
assessments)<br />
ii. Feedstock Supply R&D (ex. biology, cultivation, resource use, biomass characteristics,<br />
harvesting/dewatering)<br />
iii. Downstream Refining R&D (ex. extraction, conversion, fuel, products, fuel/product infrastructure and<br />
end-use)<br />
iv. Environmental sustainability (example: water use, GMOs, energy consumption)<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong> <strong>Comments</strong><br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 1 Criteria Score: 2<br />
Some set of CSFs should have been devised, even though the project was exploratory in nature. Industries<br />
are faced with this same task for their exploratory projects. Books have been written on how to control<br />
and gauge this work. Some sort of system should have been employed here.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 2 Criteria Score: 3<br />
The project is nearly complete a different approach to nutrient supply for algal biofuel's may be required<br />
based on its results to date.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 3 Criteria Score: 6<br />
Poultry litter needs to be shown as a potential low cost nutrient source for algaculture. Advanced fiber<br />
flocculation needs to be established as a promising technology for harvesting.<br />
<strong>Reviewer</strong>: 4 Criteria Score: 3<br />
See Overall Impression text.<br />
Page 68 of 223