19.01.2013 Views

The Journal of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children

The Journal of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children

The Journal of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A factor analysis with Varimax rotation per<strong>for</strong>med on teacher responses to pre test (N= 217)<br />

yielded three scales <strong>of</strong> teacher characteristics (43 items, Cronbach’s alpha = .85), each one<br />

describing a different dimension:<br />

(a) Teachers’ cognitive characteristics, <strong>and</strong> in particular teachers’ application <strong>of</strong> cognitive skills <strong>and</strong><br />

requirement that students do <strong>the</strong> same (apply <strong>the</strong>m as well) (13 items, Cronbach’s alpha = .78).<br />

This dimension included statements such as "Teachers are able to make meaningful<br />

connections between ideas originating in different subjects”, “Teachers present different<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> solving a problem”, <strong>and</strong> “Teachers encourage students to always think in <strong>the</strong> same<br />

way”;<br />

(b) Teachers’ personal characteristics, teaching-related characteristics, attitudes toward students,<br />

<strong>and</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> fostering creativity (17 items, Cronbach’s alpha = .86), including statements such<br />

as “Teachers respect <strong>the</strong> students" <strong>and</strong> “Teachers are aware <strong>of</strong> differences between students”;<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

(c) Teachers’ pedagogical characteristics concerning teaching modes <strong>and</strong> classroom activities (13<br />

items, Cronbach’s alpha = .81), <strong>for</strong> example, “Teachers send students to regional or national<br />

competitions” <strong>and</strong> “Teachers hold science competitions <strong>for</strong> students”.<br />

Pre–post-tests (N=147) yielded <strong>the</strong> following results: <strong>for</strong> pre-test (43 items, Cronbach’s alpha<br />

= .79); teachers’ cognitive characteristics, Cronbach’s alpha = .76; teachers’ personal<br />

characteristics, Cronbach’s alpha = .82; <strong>and</strong> teachers’ pedagogical characteristics, Cronbach’s<br />

alpha = .82. For post-test: (43 items, Cronbach’s alpha = .82), teachers’ cognitive characteristics,<br />

Cronbach’s alpha = .76; teachers’ personal characteristics, Cronbach’s alpha = .86; <strong>and</strong> teachers’<br />

pedagogical characteristics, Cronbach’s alpha = .80.<br />

PDTG program contributions questionnaire: <strong>The</strong> content <strong>of</strong> items used to measure teachers’<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> PDTG program contribution was based on US st<strong>and</strong>ards. <strong>The</strong> questionnaire (25<br />

items, Cronbach’s alpha = .97) comprised three parts:<br />

i. Teachers’ self-evaluation <strong>of</strong> what <strong>the</strong>y know about different aspects related to gifted<br />

education (15 items, Cronbach’s alpha = .97) requiring a response on a four-point Likert-type<br />

scale, ranging from 1 = "do not know" to 4 = "know." This dimension included statements<br />

such as “definitions <strong>of</strong> giftedness”, “characteristics <strong>of</strong> gifted children”, <strong>and</strong> “instructional<br />

strategies”.<br />

ii. Teachers’ self-evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir competencies (10 items, Cronbach’s alpha = .95) requiring a<br />

response on a six-point Likert-type scale referring to what teachers think <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own abilities<br />

or skills, ranging from 1 = "completely incorrect" to 6 = "completely correct. This dimension<br />

included statements such as “identify a gifted child in <strong>the</strong> regular classroom”, “better<br />

communicate with gifted students”, <strong>and</strong> “plan a lesson or unit <strong>for</strong> gifted in a pullout program”.<br />

iii. Teachers’ satisfaction <strong>and</strong> readiness requiring a response on a four-point Likert-type scale,<br />

ranging from 1 = "completely satisfied" to 4 = "completely dissatisfied”, <strong>and</strong> 1 = “completely<br />

ready” to 4 = “not ready at all”.<br />

Data analysis<br />

Qualitative data analysis<br />

Teachers’ responses <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> open-ended question were analyzed using grounded <strong>the</strong>ory<br />

(Strauss & Corbin, 1990). A pilot test <strong>for</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> open ended question, administered to 60<br />

Jewish <strong>and</strong> Arab teachers, yielded <strong>the</strong> following results:<br />

(a) Axial coding procedure generated categories from <strong>the</strong> initial coding were teachers’ personal<br />

characteristics, teachers’ pedagogical characteristics, teachers’ cognitive characteristics, gifted<br />

students’ characteristics, course characteristics, learning environment characteristics, <strong>and</strong><br />

climate characteristics; <strong>and</strong><br />

(b) Selective coding created four core categories relating to <strong>the</strong> four commonplaces: teacher,<br />

student, subject matter, <strong>and</strong> milieu. A reliability <strong>of</strong> 92% was calculated <strong>for</strong> 20% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analyzed<br />

content, per<strong>for</strong>med by two independent coders. <strong>The</strong> same categories were obtained by axial <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Gifted</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Talented</strong> International – 26(1), August, 2011; <strong>and</strong> 26(2), December, 2011. 149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!