The Journal of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children

The World Council for Gifted and Talented Children
Rowley, J. L. (2003). Teacher effectiveness in the education of gifted students: A comparison of trained, trainee
and untrained teachers of gifted and talented students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of
New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical: Translation into curriculum. School Review, 81, 501-522.
Schwab, J. J. (1978). Education and the structure of discipline. In I. Westbury, & N. J. Wilkof (Eds.), Science
curriculum and liberation: Selective assays (pp. 229-272). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shields, C. M. (1995). A comparison study of student attitudes and perceptions in homogeneous
and heterogeneous classrooms. Roeper Review, 17(4), 234-238.
Shields, P. M., Marsh, J. A., & Adelman, N. E. (1998). Evaluation of NSF’s Statewide Systemic Initiatives (SSI)
Program: The SSIs’ impacts on classroom practice. Menlo Park, CA: SRI.
Stepien, W. J., & Pyke, S. L. (1997). Designing problem-based learning units. Journal for the Education of the
Gifted, 20(4), 380-400.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.
Newbury Park. CA: Sage.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2005). Gifted programs and services: What are the nonnegotiables? Practice into Theory,
44(2), 90-97.
Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Johnsen, S. K. (2007). Teacher education standards for the field of gifted education: A
vision of coherence for personnel preparation in the 21 st century. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 182-205.
Van Tassel-Baska, J., Quek, C., & Feng, A. X. (2007). The development and use of structure teacher observation
scale to assess differentiated best practice. Roeper Review, 29(2), 84-92.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Avery, L. D., Little, C., & Hughes, C. (2000). An evaluation of the implementation of
curriculum innovation: The impact of the William and Mary units on schools. Journal for the Education of
the Gifted, 23, 244-272.
Vialle, W. & Quigley, S. (2002). Does the teacher of the gifted need to be gifted? Gifted and Talented
International, 17(2), 85 – 90.
Vidergor, H. E. (2010). Teachers of the gifted in Israel: Cognitive aspects of professional development programs.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Haifa, Israel.
Vidergor, H. E., & Eilam, B. (2010). Curriculum transformation: The Israeli teacher certification in gifted
education. Gifted and talented International, 25(2), 29-51.
Vidergor, H. E, & Eilam, B. (2011). Israeli Teachers’ Perceptions of Learning and Teaching of Gifted Students: A
Case of Cultural Orientation. Roeper Review, 33(4).
Vidergor, H. E, & Reiter, S. (2008). Frameworks for nurturing gifted students in Israel: Satisfaction with school.
Gifted and Talented International, 23(1), 38-49.
Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction,4,
45-69.
Weiss, I. R., Montgomery, D. L., Ridgway. C. J., & Bond, S. L. (1998). Local systemic change through teacher
enhancement: Year three cross-site report. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
Zorman, R., Rachmel, S., & Shaked, I. (2004). Principles for developing unique programs for gifted students.
Jerusalem: Ministry of Education, The Division for Gifted and Excellent Students (Hebrew).
Note:
Research tools (in English) developed for this study will be supplied upon request.
160 Gifted and Talented International – 26(1), August, 2011; and 26(2), December, 2011.