19.01.2013 Views

The Journal of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children

The Journal of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children

The Journal of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Talented</strong> <strong>Children</strong><br />

Results<br />

Question 1<br />

<strong>The</strong> first question was “Who are <strong>the</strong> students who choose to study in this program?” To<br />

answer this guiding question, three sub questions were asked about students’ family background,<br />

preparation <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> school entrance exam <strong>and</strong> family tradition <strong>of</strong> attending <strong>the</strong> program. Both <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong>mer <strong>and</strong> current students were similar in <strong>the</strong>ir responses to <strong>the</strong> question. <strong>The</strong>ir parents were<br />

highly educated <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m held BA degrees <strong>and</strong> white-collar jobs. Preparation <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

school entrance exam was taken seriously as <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants indicated taking private<br />

lessons prior to <strong>the</strong> exams. Finally, connections to <strong>the</strong> school through relatives (current students)<br />

<strong>and</strong> acquaintances (<strong>for</strong>mer students) played a part in <strong>the</strong> students’ choice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> school.<br />

Question 2<br />

<strong>The</strong> second question was “How do students perceive <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program in<br />

helping <strong>the</strong>m acquire a high level <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iciency <strong>and</strong> English language skills?” Seven questions were<br />

included, each <strong>of</strong>fering <strong>the</strong> following three options: “Not satisfied at all”, “Somewhat satisfied” <strong>and</strong><br />

“Completely satisfied.” <strong>The</strong> responses <strong>of</strong> current <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer students are summarized in Table 1<br />

below.<br />

Table 1: Students’ perceptions about <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program.<br />

Speaking<br />

Reading<br />

Writing<br />

Listening<br />

Grammar<br />

Vocabulary<br />

Pronunciation<br />

Current students Former students<br />

NS 6 10%<br />

NS 5 17%<br />

SS 47 78% Speaking<br />

SS 21 70%<br />

CS 7 12% CS 4 13%<br />

NS 3 5%<br />

NS 4 13%<br />

SS 43 72% Reading<br />

SS 20 67%<br />

CS 14 23% CS 6 20%<br />

NS 1 2%<br />

NS 4 13%<br />

SS 56 93% Writing<br />

SS 19 63%<br />

CS 3 5% CS 7 23%<br />

NS 6 10%<br />

NS 9 30%<br />

SS 50 83% Listening<br />

SS 14 47%<br />

CS 4 7% CS 7 23%<br />

NS 39 65%<br />

NS 8 27%<br />

SS 18 30% Grammar<br />

SS 18 60%<br />

CS 3 5% CS 4 13%<br />

NS 1 2%<br />

NS 2 7%<br />

SS 44 73% Vocabulary SS 23 77%<br />

CS 15 15% CS 5 17%<br />

NS 35 58%<br />

NS 19 63%<br />

SS 21 35% Pronunciation SS 7 23%<br />

CS 4 17% CS 4 13%<br />

Legend: NS: Not Satisfied at all SS: Somewhat Satisfied CS: Completely Satisfied<br />

<strong>The</strong> percentages in Table 1 show that except <strong>for</strong> very few differences, both current <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong>mer students had similar perceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> program. Specifically, more than<br />

70% <strong>of</strong> both current <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer students were satisfied with <strong>the</strong> opportunity to develop good<br />

speaking skills in English. For reading skills, current students had a little higher rate <strong>of</strong> satisfaction<br />

than <strong>for</strong>mer ones; but, in general, both groups were pleased with <strong>the</strong> opportunities to develop <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

reading skills in English. For writing, current students also showed a higher rate <strong>of</strong> satisfaction than<br />

<strong>for</strong>mer students, 93% <strong>of</strong> current students as compared to 63% <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer ones. 80% <strong>of</strong> current<br />

students were satisfied with <strong>the</strong> opportunity to develop good listening skills in comparison with 47%<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer students. Concerning <strong>the</strong> opportunity to acquire extensive knowledge <strong>of</strong> English<br />

84 <strong>Gifted</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Talented</strong> International – 26(1), August, 2011; <strong>and</strong> 26(2), December, 2011.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!