19.01.2013 Views

The Journal of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children

The Journal of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children

The Journal of the World Council for Gifted and Talented Children

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>World</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Gifted</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Talented</strong> <strong>Children</strong><br />

participant is faced with someone’s responses, which may be in a higher stage than his/ her own<br />

(Tirri <strong>and</strong> Pehkonen, 2002). This usually increases level <strong>of</strong> moral judgment. Kohlberg started involving<br />

whole schools, including any teachers, students, or faculty that wanted to participate, in discussing<br />

real-life moral dilemmas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants’ school situation, a technique referred to as just<br />

community, which has been proven very valuable (Power, Higgins, <strong>and</strong> Kohlberg ,1989; Kohlberg<br />

<strong>and</strong> Turiel, 1971).<br />

Kohlberg claims that <strong>the</strong>re is a core <strong>of</strong> moral values that are universal, in o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong><br />

sequence <strong>of</strong> stages is invariant, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> same <strong>for</strong> every person <strong>of</strong> each culture. As a result, certain<br />

moral values, such as <strong>the</strong> respect <strong>for</strong> human life, <strong>and</strong> not causing harm to o<strong>the</strong>rs, are upheld in all<br />

cultures.<br />

Lawrence Kohlberg (1958) based his <strong>the</strong>ories on Piaget’s ideas. Unlike Piaget, however,<br />

Kohlberg presents a more precise conceptualization <strong>and</strong> discrimination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stages, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

dimension <strong>of</strong> heteronomy-autonomy that underlie <strong>the</strong> stages. His method allows <strong>for</strong> quantified<br />

scores <strong>of</strong> judgment <strong>of</strong> moral judgment. <strong>The</strong> six stages proposed by Kohlberg are subsumed in three<br />

levels: pre conventional (stages one <strong>and</strong> two), conventional (stages three <strong>and</strong> four), <strong>and</strong> post<br />

conventional (stages five <strong>and</strong> six).<br />

<strong>The</strong> pre conventional level is characteristic <strong>of</strong> younger children, some adolescents, <strong>and</strong><br />

many criminals. <strong>The</strong>re is not yet any sense <strong>of</strong> real morality, or any internalization <strong>of</strong> values. <strong>The</strong><br />

conventional level is typical <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> adolescents <strong>and</strong> adults in U.S. society, <strong>and</strong> probably<br />

all Western societies <strong>and</strong> even non-Western societies as well (Snarey, 1985). At <strong>the</strong> post<br />

conventional level individuals have come to question <strong>the</strong> morality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> status quo <strong>and</strong> are able to<br />

change laws <strong>and</strong> cultural rules. Approximately 5 percent <strong>of</strong> adults reach <strong>the</strong> post conventional level,<br />

usually after age twenty or twenty-five. At stage one, <strong>the</strong> orientation is toward punishment <strong>and</strong><br />

obedience; at stage two, morality is geared toward pleasure <strong>and</strong> satisfaction <strong>of</strong> one’s own needs; at<br />

stage three, morality centers on pleasing o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> fulfilling conventional roles; at stage four, <strong>the</strong><br />

emphasis is on law <strong>and</strong> order; at stage five, <strong>the</strong> person tries to change unfair laws through<br />

democratic channels; <strong>and</strong> at stage six individual conscience prevails.<br />

John Snarey’s (1985) review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> literature supports this notion. He analyzed more that<br />

<strong>for</strong>ty studies conducted in twenty-seven different cultures, which support Kohlberg’s claim <strong>for</strong><br />

universality, although <strong>the</strong> higher stages (five <strong>and</strong> six) did not appear in all cultures. However, Richard<br />

Shweder <strong>and</strong> Haidat (1991) argue <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> culture, based on <strong>the</strong>ir research in India (Shweder,<br />

Mahapatra, <strong>and</strong> Miller, 1990): <strong>The</strong>y did not find distinctions between conventional <strong>and</strong> moral<br />

transgressions.<br />

Contrary to this relativistic view <strong>of</strong> morality, some neo-Kohlbergians, such as Larry Nucci<br />

(1981), distinguish between moral <strong>and</strong> conventional domains, <strong>and</strong> present evidence that even<br />

preschool children distinguish between <strong>the</strong> severities <strong>of</strong> transgressions <strong>of</strong> each domain.<br />

<strong>The</strong> main purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current study is to identify <strong>the</strong> differences in moral Judgment levels<br />

among female students according to <strong>the</strong>ir giftedness <strong>and</strong> grade levels. In specific, <strong>the</strong> study<br />

attempted to answer <strong>the</strong> following questions: Does moral judgment differ due to <strong>the</strong> differences in<br />

giftedness <strong>and</strong> grade levels? And is it possible to efficiently predict <strong>the</strong> moral judgment <strong>for</strong> gifted <strong>and</strong><br />

average female students through non verbal intelligence, creativity, <strong>and</strong> achievement?<br />

Method<br />

Study tools<br />

Three research instruments were utilized in <strong>the</strong> study: (1) Raven’s progressive matrices test<br />

is a nonverbal intelligence test consists <strong>of</strong> 48 matrices. Each one consists <strong>of</strong> 6 or 8 figures. <strong>The</strong> test<br />

has developed <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardized by Abdelraouf (1999) to be used in <strong>the</strong> Kuwaiti society <strong>for</strong> people <strong>of</strong><br />

6-18 years. Raven’s test could be administered as an individual or a group test. (2) Torrance creative<br />

verbal test (<strong>for</strong>m B) consists <strong>of</strong> six activities, <strong>the</strong> students <strong>of</strong> age up to 20 years will be asked to<br />

guess <strong>the</strong> corresponding answers. It is required from each student to provide reasons <strong>for</strong> a given<br />

behavior, <strong>and</strong> give alternative or uncommon uses <strong>of</strong> things. In addition, <strong>the</strong> test time limit is 30<br />

minutes. <strong>The</strong> psychometric properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> test has been positively assessed (Torrance, 1980). And<br />

(3) <strong>The</strong> moral maturity test prepared by Kohlberg through his dissertation on 1958 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n<br />

translated <strong>and</strong> validated by Qashqoosh in Egypt <strong>and</strong> some middle east societies. <strong>The</strong> test studied<br />

moral judgment by presenting subjects with moral dilemmas. <strong>The</strong>n categorize <strong>and</strong> classify <strong>the</strong><br />

judgment used in <strong>the</strong> responses, into one <strong>of</strong> six distinct stages, grouped into three levels: pre-<br />

26 <strong>Gifted</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Talented</strong> International – 26(1), August, 2011; <strong>and</strong> 26(2), December, 2011.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!