22.01.2013 Views

Rudolf Steiner's Vision for the Future - Anthroposophical Society in ...

Rudolf Steiner's Vision for the Future - Anthroposophical Society in ...

Rudolf Steiner's Vision for the Future - Anthroposophical Society in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Book Review<br />

Common Wealth: For a Free, Equal, Mutual<br />

and Susta<strong>in</strong>able <strong>Society</strong><br />

by Mart<strong>in</strong> Large; Hawthorn Press, 2010, 256 pgs.<br />

Review by Sarah Hearn<br />

Listlessly nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> flaws of <strong>the</strong> system can be an al-<br />

lur<strong>in</strong>g distraction from try<strong>in</strong>g to fix it. And too often <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>toxication<br />

of scrut<strong>in</strong>iz<strong>in</strong>g social problems dulls one’s faculties<br />

<strong>for</strong> perceiv<strong>in</strong>g a larger context and mapp<strong>in</strong>g a way <strong>for</strong>ward.<br />

But not so with Mart<strong>in</strong> Large, an English academic, bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />

entrepreneur, community facilitator,<br />

and all around trailblazer. Large is as<br />

<strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> “know-how” as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

“know-why” of tackl<strong>in</strong>g social problems<br />

and work<strong>in</strong>g toward Common<br />

Wealth, <strong>the</strong> title of his new book. He<br />

models a delicate balance of critiqu<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> problems, present<strong>in</strong>g practical<br />

means to effect<strong>in</strong>g positive social<br />

change, and offer<strong>in</strong>g a big-picture<br />

framework <strong>for</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> three<br />

sectors of society: economy, polity, and<br />

culture.<br />

Draw<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> part from <strong>Rudolf</strong><br />

Ste<strong>in</strong>er’s work with <strong>the</strong> threefold social<br />

organism, this framework recognizes<br />

mutuality, 1 equality, and freedom as<br />

<strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of economy,<br />

polity, and culture respectively, with<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess, government, and civil society as <strong>the</strong>ir lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

While <strong>the</strong>re’s some contention around identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

civil society as <strong>the</strong> chief vehicle of <strong>the</strong> cultural sector—particularly<br />

<strong>in</strong> anthroposophical circles—Large’s <strong>in</strong>clusive exploration<br />

could potentially calm this dispute. Large<br />

recognizes multiple def<strong>in</strong>itions of civil society: as a vast, <strong>in</strong>-<br />

46 • be<strong>in</strong>g human<br />

<strong>for</strong>mal association of community and culturally-based organizations;<br />

as those organiz<strong>in</strong>g specifically <strong>for</strong> comprehensive<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>able development, peace, and social justice; and<br />

as a larger vision <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> future, where<strong>in</strong> cultural values and<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiatives flourish, employ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> creativity of <strong>the</strong> human<br />

spirit, free from political and economic<br />

control. This last def<strong>in</strong>ition f<strong>in</strong>ds<br />

strong resonance with Ste<strong>in</strong>er’s picture<br />

of a truly free cultural life as <strong>the</strong><br />

bedrock of a healthy threefold social<br />

organism.<br />

Large draws directly on salient<br />

po<strong>in</strong>ts from Ste<strong>in</strong>er’s social ideas and<br />

also from those of a handful of contemporaries<br />

connected to <strong>the</strong> anthroposophical<br />

movement: Robert Karp,<br />

Nicanor Perlas, and Otto Scharmer, to<br />

name a few. While referenc<strong>in</strong>g wisdom<br />

and examples from an array of wellknown<br />

historical leaders, Large also has<br />

his ear to <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d of what’s fresh, relevant,<br />

and progressive <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> worlds of<br />

economics, governance, and cultural<br />

movements. This makes Common<br />

Wealth a great resource as well as an <strong>in</strong>troduction to this constellation<br />

and to a more macrocosmic understand<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

“tripolar society,” which Large outl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> part 1 of his book.<br />

But it doesn’t stop <strong>the</strong>re. He works to build a “map that can<br />

help guide action <strong>for</strong> a more susta<strong>in</strong>able society and planet,”<br />

posit<strong>in</strong>g that we all have “an <strong>in</strong>tuitive, gut-level grasp” <strong>for</strong><br />

1 In this context, “bro<strong>the</strong>rhood” or “association” is often used to describe <strong>the</strong> guid<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of economic life from a threefold perspective;<br />

however, Large’s use of “mutuality” perhaps enables a more immediate understand<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> a<strong>for</strong>ementioned words lack.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!