22.01.2013 Views

Rudolf Steiner's Vision for the Future - Anthroposophical Society in ...

Rudolf Steiner's Vision for the Future - Anthroposophical Society in ...

Rudolf Steiner's Vision for the Future - Anthroposophical Society in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

From Creature to Creator: The Human Be<strong>in</strong>g and Our <strong>Future</strong> Evolution<br />

of yet a third factor. If we were not to speak of a third factor,<br />

we should not comprise <strong>the</strong> whole of human development.<br />

Because <strong>the</strong> plant always passes through <strong>in</strong>volution<br />

and evolution, every new plant is an exact repetition of <strong>the</strong><br />

last one. The be<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> lily of <strong>the</strong> valley is perpetually<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> seed and out aga<strong>in</strong>. But what is happen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

We have just realized that <strong>the</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>g receives<br />

new possibilities of development dur<strong>in</strong>g life between birth<br />

and death. He adds to his store. Hence it is not <strong>the</strong> same<br />

with <strong>the</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>g as it is with <strong>the</strong> plant. Each evolution<br />

of <strong>the</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> earth is not a mere repetition of<br />

<strong>the</strong> previous one, but a rais<strong>in</strong>g of existence on to a higher<br />

level. What is taken <strong>in</strong> between birth and death is added to<br />

what was <strong>the</strong>re previously. That is why no mere repetition<br />

occurs, <strong>for</strong> what is evolv<strong>in</strong>g appears at a higher stage. Where<br />

does this new element actually come from? In what way are<br />

we to understand <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>g receives<br />

and takes <strong>in</strong> someth<strong>in</strong>g new? I beg you to follow very<br />

closely now, <strong>for</strong> we are com<strong>in</strong>g to a most important and<br />

most difficult concept. And not without reason do I say<br />

this <strong>in</strong> one of <strong>the</strong> last sessions, <strong>for</strong> you will have <strong>the</strong> whole<br />

summer to ponder over it. We should ponder over such<br />

concepts <strong>for</strong> months if not years, <strong>the</strong>n we gradually beg<strong>in</strong><br />

to realize <strong>the</strong>ir depth. Where does all that is constantly<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g added to <strong>the</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>g come from? We will make<br />

this comprehensible by tak<strong>in</strong>g a simple example.<br />

Suppose you see one human be<strong>in</strong>g stand<strong>in</strong>g opposite<br />

two o<strong>the</strong>r people. Let us take <strong>in</strong>to consideration everyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that belongs to evolution. Let us take <strong>the</strong> one who is observ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two, and say to ourselves that she has passed<br />

through earlier <strong>in</strong>carnations and has developed what has<br />

been planted <strong>in</strong> her <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se previous <strong>in</strong>carnations. The same<br />

applies to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two people. Then let us suppose that<br />

<strong>the</strong> first <strong>the</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>ks to herself: The one person<br />

looks splendid beside <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. She is pleased to see just<br />

<strong>the</strong>se two particular people stand<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r. Ano<strong>the</strong>r person<br />

might not feel this satisfaction. The satisfaction <strong>the</strong><br />

human be<strong>in</strong>g feels <strong>in</strong> see<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> two stand<strong>in</strong>g side by side<br />

has noth<strong>in</strong>g whatever to do with <strong>the</strong> possibilities of development<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two, <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>y have done noth<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

deserves <strong>the</strong> pleasure <strong>the</strong>ir stand<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r gives her. It is<br />

72 • be<strong>in</strong>g human<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g quite different, and it depends entirely on <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that it is she <strong>in</strong> particular who is stand<strong>in</strong>g opposite <strong>the</strong><br />

two people. The po<strong>in</strong>t is that <strong>the</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>g develops a<br />

feel<strong>in</strong>g of joy over <strong>the</strong> two persons <strong>in</strong> front of her stand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r. This feel<strong>in</strong>g is not caused by anyth<strong>in</strong>g to do with<br />

development. There are th<strong>in</strong>gs like this <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world that<br />

arise simply through co<strong>in</strong>cidence. It is not a question of <strong>the</strong><br />

two o<strong>the</strong>rs be<strong>in</strong>g karmically connected. Our concern is <strong>the</strong><br />

joy <strong>the</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>g feels because she likes see<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> two<br />

people stand<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Let us take a fur<strong>the</strong>r example. Imag<strong>in</strong>e a human be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stand<strong>in</strong>g here at a certa<strong>in</strong> spot on <strong>the</strong> earth and look<strong>in</strong>g up<br />

at <strong>the</strong> sky. He sees a particular constellation of stars. If he<br />

were to stand five paces away he would see someth<strong>in</strong>g else.<br />

This look<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> sky creates <strong>in</strong> him a feel<strong>in</strong>g of joy that is<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g quite new. The human be<strong>in</strong>g experiences a<br />

number of totally new th<strong>in</strong>gs that have noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with<br />

his previous development. Everyth<strong>in</strong>g that comes <strong>for</strong>th <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> lily of <strong>the</strong> valley is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by its previous development;<br />

but this is not <strong>the</strong> case with what works on <strong>the</strong> human<br />

soul from <strong>the</strong> environment. The human be<strong>in</strong>g is concerned<br />

with a lot of affairs that have noth<strong>in</strong>g to do with any previous<br />

development, but which are <strong>the</strong>re because various<br />

circumstances br<strong>in</strong>g him <strong>in</strong>to contact with <strong>the</strong> outer world.<br />

Because he feels this joy, however, it has become <strong>for</strong> him an<br />

experience. Someth<strong>in</strong>g has arisen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> human soul that is<br />

not determ<strong>in</strong>ed by anyth<strong>in</strong>g preced<strong>in</strong>g it but which has<br />

arisen out of noth<strong>in</strong>gness. Such creations out of noth<strong>in</strong>gness are<br />

constantly aris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> human soul. These are experiences<br />

of <strong>the</strong> soul not experienced through given circumstances but<br />

through <strong>the</strong> relationships we ourselves create connect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

circumstances one with ano<strong>the</strong>r. I want you to dist<strong>in</strong>guish<br />

between <strong>the</strong> experiences produced by given circumstances<br />

and those produced by <strong>the</strong> relationships between <strong>the</strong> various<br />

circumstances.<br />

Life really falls <strong>in</strong>to two parts, with no dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e between <strong>the</strong>m: those experiences strictly determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

previous causes, by karma, and those not determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

karma but appear<strong>in</strong>g on our horizon <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> first time. There<br />

are whole areas <strong>in</strong> human life that come under <strong>the</strong>se head<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Suppose you hear that somewhere someone has stolen<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g. What has happened is, of course determ<strong>in</strong>ed by

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!