culture, subculture and counterculture - Facultatea de Litere
culture, subculture and counterculture - Facultatea de Litere
culture, subculture and counterculture - Facultatea de Litere
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SIMONA ALECU<br />
This is the reason why looking up to individuals <strong>and</strong> personal<br />
st<strong>and</strong>points is a source of permanent knowledge for the systems oriented towards<br />
research <strong>and</strong> <strong>de</strong>velopment. When the future is not known <strong>and</strong> the changes of the<br />
environment are unpredictable, the sources of difference are as important as the<br />
opportunities for convergence. Consi<strong>de</strong>ring that conflict – if managed correctly –<br />
is essential for productive change, that is, since problems are our friends, the<br />
group perceiving conflict as an opportunity to learn, instead of avoiding the<br />
conflict or taking advantage of it to strengthen its position, is the group to<br />
prosper. M. Fullan (1993) claims that there is no learning in a system without<br />
individual learning <strong>and</strong> there cannot be group learning, without conflict<br />
management.<br />
The educational system fully corresponds to these characteristics<br />
especially since it is recommen<strong>de</strong>d that distinct work modalities should become<br />
part of the systems because these modalities need to be up to the dynamic forces<br />
of change. Developing multiple <strong>culture</strong>s <strong>and</strong> establishing flexible structures are<br />
essential consi<strong>de</strong>ring that the future is unpredictable. Likewise, getting to know<br />
different types of <strong>culture</strong>s allows adapting the changes to the specificity of the<br />
educational system, which prevents the failure of a forced takeover of different<br />
mo<strong>de</strong>ls of educational mo<strong>de</strong>ls; hence, schools can generate either a <strong>culture</strong> of<br />
<strong>de</strong>velopment – dominated by an ethos of change <strong>and</strong> perfection – or a stagnant<br />
<strong>culture</strong> – conservative, rigid, reproductive.<br />
The school analysis from the perspective of its systemic <strong>culture</strong> offers a<br />
way of un<strong>de</strong>rst<strong>and</strong>ing the role that the system of beliefs, values, i<strong>de</strong>ologies,<br />
norms, ceremonies, etc. has in the social construction of the systemic reality.<br />
Such an approach has important implications for the management of an<br />
educational system, as well as for the explanatory basis offered in the process of<br />
influence <strong>and</strong> change produced at the level of the system. For instance, the<br />
acknowledgement of the fact that the system of values, beliefs, interpretations<br />
specific to a school group is not a fixed, unaltered ‘fact’, entails the necessity for<br />
an increasing effort for i<strong>de</strong>ntifying the elements to either maintain, or to change<br />
the <strong>culture</strong> of the school system, elements to be found in the <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />
strategy as a reflection of the collective ethos.<br />
References:<br />
Bourdieu, P., J.C. Passeron 1970. La reproduction, elements pour une théorie du<br />
sistème d’enseignement, Paris: Edition <strong>de</strong> Minuit<br />
Fine, G. 1984. Negotiated Or<strong>de</strong>r <strong>and</strong> Systemic Cultures, Annual Review of<br />
Sociology, 10<br />
Fullan, M.G. 1993. Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform,<br />
London: Falmer Press<br />
H<strong>and</strong>y, C. 1993. Un<strong>de</strong>rst<strong>and</strong>ing Systems, London: Penguin Books<br />
Martin, J. 1992. Culture <strong>and</strong> Systems: Three Perspectives, Oxford: OUP<br />
Morgan, G. 1986. Images of System, London: Sage<br />
266