12.02.2013 Views

PALESTINIAN SOCIETY - Fafo

PALESTINIAN SOCIETY - Fafo

PALESTINIAN SOCIETY - Fafo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of hospital it Y , the comfort provided by the divans and chairs placed<br />

along the walls of the room and the size and luxuries of the room itself.<br />

Although these pattems have to some extent been modified by<br />

social and economic changes, the kitchen remains the domain principally<br />

ofwomen. In a society where women are largely confined to the<br />

house, have responsibility for most domestic tasks and have access to<br />

money only through the forbearance of men, women' s labour is cheap.<br />

TIms, investment in parts of the house defined as the woman' s realm<br />

makes little economic sen se and solicits little social esteem.11 Moreover,<br />

the values which underlie the consumption preferences of men<br />

are mostly shared by women. They tend tofavourdirecting investment<br />

toward the most socially prominent areas of the house.<br />

Historically, the groom's family was obliged to fumish the house<br />

to be used by the bridal couple. The fumishings provided were detailed<br />

in the wedding contract. For peasants this was usually limited to long,<br />

flat cotton mattresses and storage chests. Today, for couples moving<br />

in with the groom' s family, still common in the camps, villages and in<br />

poorer urban areas, the groom's obligation is confined to fumishing<br />

the bedroom of the couple. In high density households the bedroom<br />

is the only room that provides any degree ofprivacy forcouples living<br />

in extended households. Among middle c1assPalestinians fumiture is<br />

usually needed for a whole house and consequently constitutes a<br />

notable additional cost to getting married.<br />

Westemisation of tastes started in the Mandate period and is now<br />

almost com pl ete among the urban and rural middle cIasses. The first<br />

Figure 3.5 Internal comfort index by type of localityY<br />

Percent<br />

1<br />

90<br />

DGOOd<br />

O Average<br />

• Poor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!