Avaa tiedosto - Julkari

Asiakasnäkökulma teknologioiden käyttöönotossa
(27) Baack SA, Brown TS, Brown JT. Attitudes towards computers: Views of older adults compared with those of younger adults. J Res
Comp Educ 1991; 23(3):422-433.
(28) Karlsson M, Kaulio M. Do computers solve the problem? Telephone vs telefax vs computers in home shopping system in Scandinavia.
Paper presented in the Fifth International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI International 1993). Orlando, Florida, 8th-
13th August 1993, 427-432.
(29) Caradec V. Use of technology and ageing: an identity and family-based interpretation. In Technology Developments, the dynamics of
age, and ageing of the population (toim.) F. Bouchayer & a Rozenkier. MiRE-CNAV, Paris, 36-46.
(30) Östlund B. Images, users, practices – senior citizens entering the IT-society. KRB-rapport 1999:9. Fritzes, Stockholm, 1999.
(31) Ziefle M. & Bay S. 2004. Mental models of a cellular phone menu.Comparing older and younger novice users. Lecture notes inComputer
Science: Mobile Human-Computer Interaction. MobileHCI 2004, 25-37.
(32) Renaud K. & van Biljon J. 2008. Predicting technology acceptance andadoption by the elderly: A qualitative study. Paper presented
inSAICSIT, 6th-8th October 2008, Wilderness. ACME, 210-219.
(33) Steele R., Lo A., Secome C. & Wong Y.K. 2009. Elderly persons’perceptions and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks toassist
healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics,78(12), 788-801.
(34) Specht M., Sperandio J.-C. & de la Garza C. (1999): “L’utilisation réelledes objets techniques du quotidien par les personnes âgées».
InRéseaux, no. 96, CNET/Hermès Science Publications, 97-120.
(35) Strayer D.L., Wickens C.D. & Baune R. 1987. Adult age differences in thespeed and capacity of information processing: 2. An electrophysiologicalapproach.
Psychology and Aging, 2(2), 99-100.
(36) Lovelace E. 1990. Basic concepts in cognition and aging. Chapter 1In Aging and Cognition: Mental Processes, Self-Awareness and
Interventions, ed. E. Lovelace. Elsevier Science Publ., B.V., NorthHolland, 1-28.
(37) Mallenius S., Rossi M. & Tuunainen V.K. n.d. Factors affecting theadoption and use of mobile devices and services by elderly people -
results from a pilot study. Available at: www.classic.marshall.usc.edu/assets/025/7535.pdf
(38) Kurniawan S., Mahmud M. & Nugroho Y. 2006. A study of the use ofmobile phones by older persons. Paper presented in CHI’96.
Montreal,Quebec, Canada, 22nd-27th April 2006, 989-994.
(39) Namazi K.H. & McClintic M. 2003. Computer use among elderly personsin long-term care facilities. Educational Gerontology, 29(6),
535-550.
(40) Selwyn N. 2004. The information aged: A qualitative study of olderadults’ use of information and communication technology. Journal
ofAging Studies, 18(4), 369-383.
(41) Gilly M.C. & Zeithaml V.A. 1985. The elderly consumer and adoption oftechnologies. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 353-357.
(42) Lindqvist E. Assistive technology as cognitive support in everyday life for persond with dementia and stroke. Academic dissertation.
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Occupational Health. Karoliska institutet. Stockholm, 2012.
(43) Baltes P.B. & Baltes M.M. 1990. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The mode of selective optimization with compensation.
In Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioural sciences, eds. P.B.Baltes & M.M. Baltes. Cambridge University Press, N.Y.,
1-34.
(44) Rauhala M, Topo P. Independent living, technology and ethics. Technol Disabil 2003; 15:205–214.
(45) Zwijsen SA, Niemeijer AR, Hertogh CM. Ethics of using assistive technology in the care for community-dwelling elderly people: an
overview of the literature. Aging Ment Health. 2011;15:419-27. Review.
(46) Niemeijer AR, Frederiks BJ, Riphagen II, Legemaate J, Eefsting JA, Hertogh CM. Ethical and practical concerns of surveillance technologies
in residential care for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities: an overview of the literature. Int Psychogeriatr 2010
;22:1129-42.
(47) Fisk JD, Beattie BL, Donnelly M. Ethical considerations for decision making for treatment and re-search participation. Alzheimers
Dement 2007; 3:411-7.
(48) Sabat SR. Capacity for decision-making in Alzheimer's disease: selfhood, positioning and semiotic people. Aust N Z J Psychiatry
2005;39:1030-5
(49) Hamann J, Bronner K, Margull J, Mendel R, Diehl-Schmid J, Bühner M, Klein R, Schneider A, Kurz A, Perneczky R. Patient participation
in medical and social decisions in Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59:2045-52.
(50) Landau R, Auslander GK, Werner S, Shoval N, Heinik J. Who should make the decision on the use of GPS for people with dementia?
Aging Ment Health. 2011;15:78-84.
(51) Landau R, Auslander GK, Werner S, Shoval N, Heinik J. Families' and professional caregivers' views of using advanced technology to
track people with dementia. Qual Health Res. 2010;20:409-19.
(52) Sosiaali- ja terveysalan eettinen perusta. ETENE-julkaisuja 32. Valtakunnallinen sosiaali- ja terveysalan eettinen neuvottelukunta
ETETNE. STM, Helsinki 2011.
THL — Työpaperi 6/2013 42
Teknologioiden mahdollisuudet
iäkkäiden tapaturmien ehkäisyssä