28.10.2014 Views

Premiers - Outil de Suivi des Contrats

Premiers - Outil de Suivi des Contrats

Premiers - Outil de Suivi des Contrats

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annexe IV<br />

_____________________________________________<br />

performance might reflect motivational factors in the laboratory more than physiological<br />

capacities (Le Gaillard et al., 2004). For example running speed measured in the lab has often<br />

been linked to predation avoidance (Sorci et al., 1994; Janzen, 1995; Irschick et al., 1998;<br />

Webb et al., 2001) but the stimulation to perform is very different when there is no real<br />

predator. Second, all the factors than can influence the measure must be standardized and<br />

taken into account. In our study, we observed that the nutritional status of the turtles strongly<br />

influence their righting response (Table 3), with a longer response time after feeding. Feeding<br />

and digestion probably lead to an energetic cost in the righting response capacities of aquatic<br />

juvenile turtles, that points up possible intervention of tra<strong>de</strong>-off between physiological needs<br />

and performance capacities (Clobert et al., 2000; Main et al., 2000; Ghalambor et al., 2004).<br />

Similarly, several authors have shown a strong effect of the ambient temperature on<br />

locomotor performance (Elphick et al., 1998; Steyermark et al., 2001; Freedberg et al., 2004).<br />

So conditions un<strong>de</strong>r which measures are performed must be standardized and/or taken into<br />

account to permit comparison between performance studies and to avoid too many<br />

confounding effects.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In evolutionary ecology, un<strong>de</strong>rstanding the relationships between phenotype and fitness is<br />

particularly important because it allows to evaluate the mechanism by which natural selection<br />

acts (Arnold, 1983; Huey et al., 1990; Garland et al., 1994). In this context, experimental<br />

<strong>de</strong>signs offer particular interest, since individuals and their environment can be much more<br />

easily controlled than in nature. However, our results showed that experimental conditions per<br />

se, usually not representative of natural conditions, strongly influence the impact of the<br />

different effects tested on the performance trait observed. Furthermore, the choice of the<br />

performance trait itself influences the results. Then, caution must be taken in extrapolating to<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!