SummaryIt is essential to work on substitution of hazardous chemical substances used by the industryin order to reach the national environmental quality objective A Non-Toxic Environment.The present report gives examples of how work on substitution could be carried out incompanies and how enforcement authorities can support and examine companies in thisrespect.The background documentation consists of interviews with company representatives andspokespersons of authorities at central, regional and local levels.The report includes the experiences of representatives from 14 different companies, mostlymanufacturers with professional customer stocks, but also manufacturers of consumerproducts, one retailer and one service company are represented.Furthermore, 31 environmental inspectors and officers at municipalities and county councilsparticipated. Finally, representatives of four sector organisations contributed to the report.Important differences have been identified with respect to how companies and authoritieschoose to work on substitution of chemicals, and a pattern of three parts has appeared:• Passive companies, which do not pursue any work on substitution. These companiesneed pushing to become aware of risks, obligations and possibilities.• Active companies carry out work on substitution and the challenge lies in integratingthe work in everyday activities, that is to say systemising the work, use availableinformation, refer to environmental management systems and in-house control.• Proactive companies work on developing their substitution activities, which includesdevelopment of new products, new alliances and partnerships, exchange ofexperience, appearance in different forums.A similar division can be applied to the work of authorities, among other things depending ontheir available resources, competence and interest.From a general point of view, the following observations have been made on the basis of thebackground documentation:• There are companies carrying out active and ambitious work on chemicalssubstitution. A number of these have been identified within the framework of thisreport and they contribute with different examples of how work on substitution can beorganised at company level.• There are enforcement authorities pursuing active and/or proactive and ambitiouswork to stimulate chemical substitution activities among companies. A number ofalternatives to how the work can be organised in county councils and municipalitieshave been identified.• In addition, there are other players pursuing active work to support and developsubstitution activities in companies, including some sector organisations, waterpurification plants and suppliers. A number of different stakeholders could make itpossible to affect a company’s work on chemical substitution.• There are large variations in how active different companies, enforcement authorities,sector organisations and other actors are in their work on phasing out hazardous7
substances. This is also mirrored in differences in knowledge, organisation andpersonal engagement.• Experience gained at one place (company or authority) is too seldom taken advantageof and transferred in a systematic way.• When approaching the environmental quality target A Non-Toxic Environment, a needbecomes visible on the one hand to concretize its content and on the other to pushseveral actors to leave a passive attitude and take on a more proactive stance.• It takes development projects, systematic build-up of knowledge, continuity, longtermthinking and co-ordination to go from being passive to proactive in work onsubstitution.• The need for support varies a great deal between different companies. There is a largespan between initiating basic measures, and for instance to further develop thecompany´s own database on chemicals.• Incentives for companies to practice active work on substitution are generally considered weak and the energy to trigger the process as high. • Enforcement authorities have a key role to initiate substitution work in a company.Sector organisations are other important actors.The report presents proposals for activities in support of the work to substitute hazardouschemical products in companies and to improve the conditions for environmental inspectorsand officers at municipalities and county councils to push on this work (Chapter 5).Annex 1 contains summaries of how some of the interviewed companies work to reduce riskswith chemical substances, for instance by substitution.8