20.02.2013 Views

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74 3 Pulmonary <strong>Drug</strong> Delivery: Delivery To and Through the Lung<br />

the correct size distribution during adequate inhalation. The inspiratory flow as the driving<br />

force for discharge of the dose system, fine particle generation during powder disintegration<br />

and particle deposition in the respiratory tract is one of the most important parameters. If the<br />

patient is unable to achieve the threshold values (for the relevant flow parameters) for good<br />

inhaler performance, the fine particle fraction will be too low for adequate efficacy. If the<br />

flow rate is too high, a substantial loss of the fine particle dose by inertial deposition in the<br />

oropharynx must be expected.<br />

The nature of the flow curve achieved, depends on three different factors: the instructions<br />

given to the patient, the patient’s effort following these instruction and the resistance to airflow<br />

of the DPI (Figure 3.4). Most instructions for use of DPIs prescribe forceful and deep inhalation.<br />

Patient interpretation of these instructions often vary considerably. Patient variables<br />

also include age, gender, condition and clinical assessment. In Section 3.9 the attainable<br />

pressure drops across external resistances as a function of clinical condition will be discussed<br />

more in detail. The DPI’s resistance is a consequence of its design. Narrow channels in the<br />

dose system and the disintegration principle in addition to turbulent air zones, increase the<br />

resistance and reduce the attainable peak flow rate through the device. This is an advantage<br />

from the deposition point of view. High resistance DPIs generally have a high disintegration<br />

efficacy and do not require high flow rates to achieve an acceptable dose of fine particles. Recently,<br />

a multi-dose dry powder inhaler has been introduced (Sofotec Novolizer) in which<br />

the resistance can be controlled over a certain range by means of a sheath flow around the<br />

aerosol cloud, without changing the fine particle output [55].<br />

3.8 Airflow Resistance<br />

The underpressure created in the respiratory tract is the driving force for the airflow through<br />

an inhalation device. The attainable underpressure and the rate of the airflow both depend<br />

on the total resistance in the airways and inhaler. The pressure drop achieved during inhalation<br />

is furthermore a function of the anatomy of the lungs, the effort made by the patient,<br />

pathological factors and the presence of exacerbations (e.g. in case of asthma).<br />

A large proportion of the airflow resistance in the airways (internal resistance: R i) is offered<br />

by the upper respiratory tract in which the airflow is already turbulent at relatively low<br />

flow rates of 30 to 40 l min –1 (R E > 2000: see also Section 3.2.1). During quiet mouth breathing,<br />

the mouth, pharynx, larynx and trachea account for 20–30% of total airway resistance.<br />

The same region contributes as much as 50% to total resistance during heavy breathing however.<br />

In the small peripheral airways (those less than 2 mm in diameter), resistance is quite<br />

low and the contribution to R i is not more than 10–20% [21].<br />

For nebulizers and MDIs, the external resistance (R E) is quite low. Different approaches<br />

have been made to describe the external airflow resistance of DPIs. Olsson and Asking [99]<br />

derived an empirical relationship between flow rate (Φ) and pressure drop (∆P), ∆P = C.Φ 1.9 ,<br />

for a number of inhalers (such as Rotahaler, Spinhaler and Turbuhaler) in which they<br />

define the proportionality coefficient (C) as the airflow resistance. This relationship differs<br />

only slightly from the general (theoretical) equation for orifice types of flow constrictions:<br />

Φ V = Fu(A) x (2∆P/ρ A) 0.5 (3.2)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!