Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies
Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies
Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
168 6 A Practical Approach in the Design of Colon-specific <strong>Drug</strong> Delivery Systems<br />
6.5 Concluding Remarks<br />
All the methods for colon-specific drug delivery presented in this overview are more or less<br />
susceptible to changes in the physiological environment (diet, disease state, medication, etc.).<br />
This may affect reliability and reproducibility of the delivery systems. However, most of the<br />
systems described have already been investigated in vivo with regard to colon specificity.<br />
Methods such as planar γ-scintigraphy [86,97,107] and three-dimensional magnetic marker<br />
monitoring [108,109] appear to be the methods of choice for dynamic visualization of the<br />
dosage form in the GI tract and the determination of the location and time of onset of drug<br />
release. In animal models, the measurement of blood and intestinal tissue concentrations of<br />
the perorally administered drug in order to quantify the reduction in the systemic exposure,<br />
is an additional approach [110]. However, most formulations are tested in healthy humans or<br />
animals in spite of the fact, that pathological conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease<br />
may have a significant influence on gut physiology.As yet, little is known regarding the effect<br />
of disease states on the intestinal transit time, GI tract motility, luminal pH, intra-luminal<br />
colonic pressure and composition of colonic microflora. It appears that time-controlled drug<br />
release systems, which rely on a constant transit time through the small intestine, are the most<br />
promising colon-specific delivery systems, as this transit time is only marginally influenced by<br />
pathological events in the GI tract. pH-controlled systems are reliable only if there is a significant<br />
difference in the luminal pH between the small and the large intestine. Under physiological<br />
conditions this pH difference is often too small. In certain pathological conditions<br />
such as inflammatory bowel disease however, a significant decrease in pH in the affected GI<br />
tract regions may be observed, and this has led to the development of novel pH-controlled<br />
delivery systems. Enzyme-controlled delivery systems are dependent on the activity of the<br />
microbial enzymes in the large intestine, which are susceptible to many environmental factors,<br />
particularly diet and medication. The reliability of pressure-controlled delivery systems<br />
is expected to be highly dependent on variations in intestinal peristalsis despite promising in<br />
vivo data.<br />
References<br />
[1] Simon GL, Gorbach SL, Gastroenterology 1984, 86, 174–193.<br />
[2] Drasar BS, Hill MJ, In: Human Intestinal Flora, pp. 103-123. Academic Press, London, 1974.<br />
[3] Bragger JL, Yazaki E, Evans DF, Pharm. Res. 1997, 14 (11 Suppl.), S656–S657.<br />
[4] Mitsuoka T, Intestinal Bacteria and Health. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Tokyo, 1978.<br />
[5] Evans DF, Pye G, Bramley R, Clark AG, Dyson TJ, Hardcastle JD, Gut 1988, 29, 1035–1041.<br />
[6] Shameem M, Katori N, Aoyagi N, Kojima S, Pharm. Res. 1995, 12, 1049–1054.<br />
[7] Haeberlin B, Friend DR, In: Oral Colon-<strong>Specific</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> Delivery (Ed. Friend DR), pp. 1–43. CRC<br />
Press, Boca Raton, 1992.<br />
[8] Zeitz M, Digestion 1997, 58 (Suppl. 1), 59–61.<br />
[9] Bhatti MA, Hodgson HJF, Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 1995, 76, 309–315.<br />
[10] Morteau O, Bueno L, Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol. 1995, 19, 204–214.<br />
[11] Warren BF, Watkins PE, J. Pathol. 1994, 172, 313–316.<br />
[12] Pories SE, Ramchurren N, Summerhayes I, Steele G, Arch. Surg. 1993, 128, 647–653.<br />
[13] Fix JA, J. Pharm. Sci. 1996, 85, 1282–1285.<br />
[14] Ashford M, Fell JT, Attwood D, Woodhead PJ, Int. J. Pharm. 1993, 91, 241–145.<br />
[15] Ashford M, Fell JT, Attwood D, Sharma H, Woodhead PJ, Int. J. Pharm. 1993, 95, 193–199.<br />
[16] Dew MJ, Ryder REJ, Evans N, Evans BK, Rhodes J, Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1983, 16, 185–187.