20.02.2013 Views

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

248 9 Tumour Vasculature <strong>Targeting</strong><br />

carrier<br />

molecule<br />

fibrin<br />

fibrinogen<br />

tTF<br />

tumor endothelium<br />

specific target epitope<br />

fVIIa<br />

thrombin<br />

prothrombin<br />

tumor endothelial cell<br />

Figure 9.4. Schematic representation of the mechanism of action of the coaguligand approach. Cross<br />

linking of truncated Tissue Factor to tumour endothelial cells leads to local blood coagulation via the<br />

tTF/fVIIa complex. tTF, truncated Tissue Factor; fVIIa, factor VIIa; fX (A), factor X (A).<br />

subcutaneous tumours, twice with BsAb * tTF coaguligand led to 38% complete tumour regressions<br />

and 24% partial responses [94]. The attractiveness of the coaguligand approach is<br />

the use of a truncated form of TF which is devoid of coagulation-inducing activity as long as<br />

it is prevented from complexing with the lipophilic factor X on cell membranes. Upon cross<br />

linking of the hydrophilic tTF with the target cell membranes by the BsAb, tTF becomes<br />

complexed with factor X. In the presence of factor VII/VIIa, this leads to the induction of<br />

blood coagulation (Figure 9.4). It is thought that there is a threshold in the number of tTF<br />

cross linked to cell membranes, above which the coagulation cascade is initiated. In theory,<br />

this allows tumour endothelium-associated target epitopes to be utilized which are highly but<br />

not exclusively, expressed on tumour endothelium. The level of expression on other vascular<br />

beds is then too low to trigger coagulation after cross linking of the coaguligand.<br />

Using a similar approach of tumour infarction, mouse solid Hodgkin’s tumours spontaneously<br />

expressing endothelial VCAM-1 were significantly retarded in outgrowth [95]. The<br />

anti-tumour effect was not as dramatic as seen in the MHC Class II model. Possibly, the number<br />

of tTF molecules delivered at the site of the tumour endothelium was not sufficient to<br />

create a rapid and more or less generalized pro-coagulant situation throughout the tumour<br />

vasculature. Only if coagulation is induced in the majority of vessels, will the number of tumour<br />

cells deprived of nutrients be sufficient enough to show strong anti-tumour effects. Furthermore,<br />

anti-coagulation activities may be strong enough to counteract the coaguligand effects<br />

when the kinetics of coagulation induction are insufficient to imbalance local pro- and<br />

anti-coagulation activities.<br />

The coagulation induction potency of coaguligand formulations are likely to be determined<br />

by the following factors: (i) the number of target epitopes on the tumour endothelium<br />

that allow BsAb-mediated interaction between tTF and factor X on the target cell membrane;<br />

(ii) local anti-coagulation activity which may be regulated in a species-specific manner;<br />

and (iii) the kinetics of cross linking of the BsAb and the target epitopes in relation to<br />

the kinetics of coagulation induction capacity. The number of MHC Class II and VCAM-1<br />

molecules expressed on the tumour vasculature of the animal models discussed, were high, as<br />

were the affinities of the antibodies used. This enabled a significant number of tTF to be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!