20.02.2013 Views

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102 4 Cell <strong>Specific</strong> Delivery of Anti-Inflammatory <strong>Drug</strong>s to Hepatic Cells<br />

layer. Some of the opsonizing proteins that have been found to play a role are complement<br />

factors [100] and fibronectin [101].The opsonization of liposomes by plasma proteins, in particular<br />

complement factors C3bi and C5a, affects the cell selectivity of this carrier, causing<br />

uptake by the RES and by neutrophils [102]. The uptake of liposomes containing the negatively-charged<br />

phospholipid phophatidylserine (PS) is still a matter of debate. These liposomes<br />

may be taken up by the RES via specific PS receptors or via scavenger receptors, but<br />

here too uptake appears to be mediated predominantly by plasma proteins that bind in a PSspecific<br />

manner to liposomes [103]. The influence of plasma proteins on the uptake route of<br />

PS-containing liposomes was shown by Kamps et al. In vitro studies with liposomes containing<br />

30% PS showed scavenger receptor-mediated uptake in KCs and SECs, but subsequent<br />

in vivo studies did not reveal a significant contribution of scavenger receptors to the KC uptake<br />

of these liposomes [104]. <strong>Specific</strong> scavenger-mediated uptake of liposomes by SECs was<br />

achieved by coating liposomes with negatively-charged albumins [105].<br />

Lipoproteins are endogenous carriers for the transport of cholesterol and other lipids in<br />

the blood circulation and can be regarded as ‘natural liposomes’. Because they are endogenous,<br />

they are not immunogenic and escape recognition by the RES. They are cleared from<br />

the circulation by specific lipoprotein receptors that recognize the apolipoproteins [106].<br />

They can be directed to non-lipoprotein receptors as well, by chemical modification of the<br />

apolipoprotein moiety. <strong>Specific</strong> scavenger receptor-mediated uptake by SECs was achieved<br />

by the acetylation of LDL, whereby oxidized LDL was specifically taken up by KCs via the<br />

scavenger receptors and lactosylated LDL via the galactose-particle receptors [106–108].<br />

The lipid core can be used to incorporate lipophilic drugs, whereas more hydrophilic drugs<br />

have to be provided with a lipophilic anchor to enable incorporation. Oleyl, retinyl and cholesteryl<br />

residues have been used for this purpose [109]. Chemical derivatization will however,<br />

alter the pharmacological activity of the parent drug in most cases. The anchors should<br />

therefore be easily removable inside the cell, yielding the original drugs. These liposomes<br />

have not as yet been used much to target drugs to KCs and SECs. Just one study described<br />

the enhancement of the tumouricidal activity of KCs with the immunomodulator muramyldipeptide<br />

incorporated in lactosylated LDL [110].<br />

4.5.1.3 Carriers with Intrinsic Anti-inflammatory Activity<br />

Another approach to drug targeting is the use of carriers with an intrinsic pharmacological<br />

activity. In this ‘dual targeting’ strategy a beneficial effect is achieved both from the carrier itself<br />

and the drug it carries. The negatively-charged HSA carriers, for instance, developed for<br />

the targeting of drugs to HIV-infected cells, exert strong antiviral activity themselves [111].<br />

Possible carriers with intrinsic anti-inflammatory activity are superoxide dismutase (SOD)<br />

and alkaline phosphatase (AP).<br />

SOD is a major oxygen free radical scavenging enzyme, which may therefore have beneficial<br />

effects in liver fibrosis. Through mannosylation or coupling to the polyanion DIVEMA,<br />

SOD was made more liver specific. Both conjugates showed superior inhibition of intrahepatic<br />

ROS production in fibrotic rats as compared to unmodified SOD. DIVEMA-SOD, however,<br />

exhibited the most potent inhibitory effects [112].Although their mode of action is most<br />

probably extracellular free radical scavenging, Man-SOD and DIVEMA-SOD are likely to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!