20.02.2013 Views

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3 Renal Delivery Using Macromolecular Carriers: The Low Molecular Weight Protein Approach 143<br />

tion of the protein leakage. However, it should be noted that tubular reabsorption of LMW-<br />

Ps is only slightly reduced during adriamycin-induced chronic proteinuria [92]. With respect<br />

to LMWP catabolism, the data suggest that protein overload will lead to reduced proteolytic<br />

degradation. In that case, an acid labile spacer or a disulfide bond should be chosen to<br />

guarantee an adequate rate of drug release.<br />

We found a difference in susceptibility to proteinuria between cationic LMWP cytochrome-c<br />

and neutral LMWP myoglobulin with respect to their catabolism. This may indicate<br />

that the effect of proteinuria on LMWP catabolism is determined by the proximal tubular<br />

segment in which the LMWPs and the protein overload are processed [88,89,93,94]. We<br />

speculate that, through coupling to a specific LMWP, drugs can be delivered specifically to<br />

those proximal tubular cells that are predominantly affected by proteinuria.This might be essential<br />

for drugs chosen to protect the tubular cell from further damage by proteinuria. In addition,<br />

it may be possible to use certain LMWPs as drug carriers to circumvent the proteinuria-affected<br />

cells. In that case, treatment of diseases unrelated to proteinuria will not be hindered<br />

by the severity of proteinuria.<br />

5.3.6 Renal Delivery of High Doses of LMWPs<br />

The renal cell responsible for the uptake of LMWPs is the proximal tubular cell. LMWPs are<br />

relatively freely filtered by the glomerulus and subsequently reabsorbed by the proximal<br />

tubular cell by megalin/gp330 receptor-mediated endocytosis [95]. In healthy individuals, the<br />

relatively moderate amounts of endogenous LMWPs are completely reabsorbed by the<br />

proximal tubular cells. However, for drug targeting purposes, larger doses of LMWP may be<br />

required. We compared the urinary loss of intact LMWP after intravenous administration of<br />

different doses of LMWP by either single dose injections or by continuous infusions in<br />

healthy rats. From these studies, we concluded that after a continuous low-dose infusion the<br />

non-reabsorbed fraction is considerably less than that after single high-dose injections. However,<br />

infusion could not entirely prevent the loss of intact LMWP into the urine (the loss was<br />

8% of the dose after 100 mg lysozyme kg –1 over 6 h and rose to 33% following<br />

1000 mg lysozyme kg –1 over 6 h).<br />

Cojocel et al. demonstrated clear adverse effects after relatively high doses of lysozyme<br />

[96]. We studied these aspects in more detail and concluded that lysozyme should be given<br />

in a dose of less than 100 mg –1 kg –1 over 6 h to minimize the negative effects on systemic<br />

blood pressure, glomerular filtration and renal blood flow. From these data, it emerged that<br />

LMWPs are suitable to serve as drug carriers to the proximal tubular cell of the kidney. However,<br />

the conjugate should preferably be administered in low-dose by constant infusion to<br />

limit the systemic and renal toxicity and to reduce the urinary loss of the intact conjugate<br />

(unpublished data).<br />

5.3.7 Limitations of the LMWP Strategy of <strong>Drug</strong> Delivery to the Kidney<br />

Among the disadvantages of the LMWP strategy for the treatment of chronic renal disease<br />

are the requirement for parenteral administration and the possible immunogenicity of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!