20.02.2013 Views

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9.3.1 Growth Factor Receptor <strong>Targeting</strong><br />

Endothelial cells in normal vasculature are quiescent and divide approximately once every<br />

6 months [74] and about 0.01% of endothelial cells is in S-phase at any given time. In contrast,<br />

at areas of active angiogenesis, e.g. in tumour growth, wound healing and in reproductive<br />

tissues undergoing remodelling, endothelial cells divide rapidly. Increased proliferation<br />

in these areas is accompanied by over-expression of growth factor receptors involved in angiogenesis.<br />

Some of the well-characterized receptor systems involved in angiogenic response<br />

are VEGF receptors, angiopoietin receptor (Tie-2), FGF receptor and endoglin.With the exception<br />

of Tie-2 receptor, these receptor systems have all been studied for their application<br />

as targets in order to selectively inhibit tumour endothelial cell proliferation and function.<br />

9.3.1.1 VEGF Receptor <strong>Targeting</strong><br />

9.3 Tumour Vasculature <strong>Targeting</strong> and Pre-clinical Experience 243<br />

VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 are over-expressed on tumour vasculature, while being present at<br />

low density in the surrounding normal tissues [75]. The upregulation of VEGFR expression<br />

is mediated by hypoxia and autocrine stimulation. Since growth factor receptors undergo endocytosis<br />

upon ligand binding, VEGF was initially studied for its ability to deliver toxin<br />

polypeptides. In these studies, VEGF-165 was chemically linked to a truncated form of diphtheria<br />

toxin (DT385) by a disulfide bond. The toxin molecule used is truncated at position<br />

385 by genetic deletion to eliminate direct binding of diphtheria toxin to endothelial cells.<br />

The resultant molecule has the catalytic domain (A-chain) of diphtheria toxin and the<br />

translocation domain of the B-chain.The A-chain of diphtheria toxin possesses ADP-ribosylase<br />

activity and ribosylates elongation factor-2 (EF-2) at a specific, post-translationally modified<br />

histidine residue called diphthamide. Consequently, EF-2 is irreversibly inactivated<br />

leading to precipitous inhibition of protein synthesis in the target cells.The VEGF–toxin conjugate<br />

was found to be quite effective in inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation in vitro and<br />

experimental angiogenesis in vivo [76]. Cytotoxicity to endothelial cells was specific and dependent<br />

on VEGFR expression. Free toxin molecules did not show any effect on endothelial<br />

cell viability. VEGF–toxin conjugate treatment of tumour-bearing mice resulted in selective<br />

vascular damage in the tumour tissue and inhibited tumour growth [77]. Histological studies<br />

demonstrated that conjugate treatment spared the blood vessels of normal tissues such as<br />

liver, lung and kidney from being damaged. The differential effects of VEGFR targeting on<br />

tumour vasculature can possibly be attributed to three factors, (1) over-expression of VEG-<br />

FR in tumour vessels leading to increased homing of the VEGF–toxin conjugate, (2) proliferation-dependent<br />

sensitivity to the effector moiety in the conjugate, and (3) polarized distribution<br />

of VEGFR. Over-expression of VEGFR on tumour vessels has been well documented.<br />

Recent in vitro studies suggest that only proliferating endothelial cells are sensitive<br />

to the VEGF–toxin conjugate. Quiescent, confluent endothelial cells were found to be totally<br />

resistant to the cytotoxic activity of VEGF–toxin. Endothelial cells in healthy tissues are<br />

quiescent and therefore may have escaped the cytotoxicity of the VEGF–toxin conjugate.<br />

Definite evidence for the third possibility is forthcoming. It is likely that the VEGFR is abluminally<br />

distributed and therefore inaccessible to systemically circulating VEGF–toxin conjugate.<br />

At the tumour site however, increased permeability and vascular leakage may facilitate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!