20.02.2013 Views

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

Drug Targeting Organ-Specific Strategies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

302 11 Development of Proteinaceous <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Targeting</strong> Constructs<br />

structs, the recombinant protein could function as a competitive substrate for HIV-1 protease.This<br />

approach made use of the fact that surface-exposed loops of globular proteins can<br />

often tolerate insertions of additional amino acids without altering the function of the protein<br />

[142]. Molecular modelling was used to select candidate insertion sites in surface-exposed<br />

loops of transferrin that were distant from the biologically active domains.<br />

Evidently, resolution of the three-dimensional structures of proteins will aid in the design<br />

of rational approaches for constructing drug conjugates, as demonstrated by the above-mentioned<br />

examples. Evaluation of molecular structure at this level may prove to be one of the<br />

more successful approaches used in the design of recombinant drug conjugates.<br />

11.9 Recombinant Domains as Building Blocks for <strong>Drug</strong><br />

<strong>Targeting</strong> Constructs<br />

With the growing knowledge about protein structure–function relationships and the availability<br />

of new techniques like phage display, we are now able to select small proteinaceous sequences<br />

that could function as building blocks for recombinant targeting constructs. Such<br />

building blocks can function as a targeting moiety (homing device), a membrane translocation<br />

moiety and/or an active drug substance. In order to facilitate the construction of recombinant<br />

preparations, it seems reasonable to assemble the final construct from smaller subunits.<br />

11.9.1 <strong>Targeting</strong> Domain<br />

Probably the smallest sequence known to be responsible for receptor recognition is the<br />

RGD-tripeptide, initially discovered in fibronectin [143]. However, the specificity of the interaction<br />

with different integrins, the counter receptors of RGD sequences on the cell surface,<br />

is established by the flanking sequences of the RGD motif and the conformation of the<br />

tripeptide. In other words, the presentation of the RGD sequence is important for specific<br />

recognition by individual integrins.<br />

Insertion of RGD sequences as targeting domains into protein carriers, is an attractive approach<br />

for integrin-directed targeting. Studies with RGD sequences of viral origin cloned<br />

into solvent-exposed regions of β-galactosidase demonstrated binding and internalization of<br />

the active chimeric enzyme into mammalian cells [144]. Likewise, introduction of an RGD<br />

motif into the capsid protein of adenoviruses was shown to increase the cell-specific delivery<br />

of adenoviral vectors as gene delivery vehicles [145]. Fusion proteins containing RGD sequences<br />

are likely to be effective delivery systems but the clinical relevance thereof awaits<br />

further analysis.The RGD motif can form the targeting domain, but at the same time can also<br />

function as the active drug, since its binding to the receptor may result in prevention or disruption<br />

of the natural ligand–integrin interaction, and consequently in a therapeutic response.<br />

The use of phage-display techniques has identified peptide ligands with specific affinity to<br />

cell surface receptors or specific tissues (see Table 11.2). Such peptide homing devices can be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!